BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34318580)

  • 1. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
    Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation.
    Moin DA; Hassan B; Parsa A; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 23278702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.
    Flügge T; Ludwig U; Winter G; Amrein P; Kernen F; Nelson K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Aug; 31(8):737-746. PubMed ID: 32459868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.
    Flügge T; Derksen W; Te Poel J; Hassan B; Nelson K; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 27440381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing a novel dental root analogue implant using cone beam computed tomography and CAD/CAM technology.
    Moin DA; Hassan B; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():25-7. PubMed ID: 22092354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of dental MRI for radiation-free guided dental implant planning: a prospective, in vivo study of accuracy and reliability.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Jende JME; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6392-6401. PubMed ID: 32960331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets.
    Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 23581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional models from cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes.
    Mukhia N; Birur NP; Shubhasini AR; Shubha G; Keerthi G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Sep; 132(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 34246615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Oral Implant Planning Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Schwindling FS; Boehm S; Herpel C; Kronsteiner D; Vogel L; Juerchott A; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Rammelsberg P; Hilgenfeld T
    J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(23):. PubMed ID: 34884244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study.
    Yi C; Li S; Wen A; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Zhang Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36424579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-cone beam computed tomography rigid registration of the head: an in-vitro study.
    Al-Saleh MA; Punithakumar K; Jaremko JL; Alsufyani NA; Boulanger P; Major PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 26795452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.