143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34318696)
21. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: towards defining criteria to the right choice.
Zelhart M; Kaiser AM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 28812154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of robotic reduced-port and laparoscopic approaches for left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.
Wei PL; Huang YJ; Wang W; Huang YM
Asian J Surg; 2023 Feb; 46(2):698-704. PubMed ID: 35778241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.
Stewart CL; Ituarte PHG; Melstrom KA; Warner SG; Melstrom LG; Lai LL; Fong Y; Woo Y
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2591-2601. PubMed ID: 30357525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adoption of robotic technology in Turkey: A nationwide analysis on caseload and platform used.
Esen E; Aytac E; Ozben V; Bas M; Bilgin IA; Aghayeva A; Baca B; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1962. PubMed ID: 30334328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.
Lo BD; Leeds IL; Sundel MH; Gearhart S; Nisly GRC; Safar B; Atallah C; Fang SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 May; 63(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 32032198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic colorectal surgery and future directions.
Erozkan K; Gorgun E
Am J Surg; 2024 Apr; 230():91-98. PubMed ID: 37953126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: a cohort study examining clinical outcomes and cost.
Wilkie B; Summers Z; Hiscock R; Wickramasinghe N; Warrier S; Smart P
Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):526-530. PubMed ID: 30922441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer resections.
Hettiarachchi TS; Askari A; Rudge E; Hao LT; Sarwar S; Dowsett D; El Hadi A; Shaikh I
J Robot Surg; 2023 Feb; 17(1):205-213. PubMed ID: 35610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Trends and consequences of surgical conversion in the United States.
Abd El Aziz MA; Grass F; Behm KT; D'Angelo AL; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 33409592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Trends of robotic-assisted surgery for thyroid, colorectal, stomach and hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer: 10 year Korea trend investigation.
An L; Hwang KS; Park SH; Kim YN; Baek SJ; Park S; Hyung WJ; Chung WY; Kim SH;
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 32571714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The death of laparoscopy.
Ferrari D; Violante T; Novelli M; Starlinger PP; Smoot RL; Reisenauer JS; Larson DW
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2677-2688. PubMed ID: 38519609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally invasive treatment of colorectal liver metastases: does robotic surgery provide any technical advantages over laparoscopy? A multicenter analysis from the IGoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry.
Masetti M; Fallani G; Ratti F; Ferrero A; Giuliante F; Cillo U; Guglielmi A; Ettorre GM; Torzilli G; Vincenti L; Ercolani G; Cipressi C; Lombardi R; Aldrighetti L; Jovine E
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):535-545. PubMed ID: 35099776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery: status and technical specifications.
Keller DS; Ibarra S; Haas EM
Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 26149521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study.
Grosek J; Ales Kosir J; Sever P; Erculj V; Tomazic A
Radiol Oncol; 2021 May; 55(4):433-438. PubMed ID: 34051705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
