399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34318772)
1. A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An
Mankeliya S; Singhal RK; Gupta A; Jaiswal N; Pathak VK; Kushwah A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 May; 22(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 34318772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and decalcification effect of QMix, maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentine.
Ballal NV; Jain I; Tay FR
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():62-8. PubMed ID: 27287285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lactic acid root canal irrigation for dowel and core treatment: a pilot study.
Ayad MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 15583559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin.
Ballal NV; Jain H; Rao S; Johnson AD; Baeten J; Wolcott JF
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jan; 77(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 30387687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.
Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.
Singh AK; Khateeb SU; Pathrose SP; Kumar AS; Haribaskar S; Thota G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 34257180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.
Zhu X; Yin X; Chang JW; Wang Y; Cheung GS; Zhang C
Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Aug; 31(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 23863104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study.
Demirel A; Yüksel BN; Ziya M; Gümüş H; Doğan S; Sari Ş
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):380-385. PubMed ID: 30859897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and citric acid solutions for smear layer removal in primary tooth root canals.
Pitoni CM; Figueiredo MC; Araújo FB; Souza MA
J Dent Child (Chic); 2011; 78(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 22126924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An
Kaushal R; Bansal R; Malhan S
J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33223646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
