These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34320327)

  • 1. Anger Damns the Innocent.
    DeCelles KA; Adams GS; Howe HS; John LK
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Aug; 32(8):1214-1226. PubMed ID: 34320327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The world is not fair: an examination of innocent and guilty suspects' waiver decisions.
    Scherr KC; Franks AS
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 25602182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.
    Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 15796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.
    Normile CJ; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 30284849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobilization and resistance in response to interrogation threat.
    Guyll M; Yang Y; Madon S; Smalarz L; Lannin DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):307-318. PubMed ID: 31282707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond.
    Scherr KC; Redlich AD; Kassin SM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):353-383. PubMed ID: 32027576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "I'd know a false confession if I saw one": a comparative study of college students and police investigators.
    Kassin SM; Meissner CA; Norwick RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):211-27. PubMed ID: 15912725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowingly but naively: The overpowering influence of innocence on interrogation rights decision-making.
    Scherr KC; Normile CJ; Bierstetel SJ; Franks AS; Hawkins I
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 29016152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses.
    Marion SB; Kukucka J; Collins C; Kassin SM; Burke TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 26301711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: effects on physiologic activity.
    Guyll M; Madon S; Yang Y; Lannin DG; Scherr K; Greathouse S
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Oct; 37(5):366-75. PubMed ID: 23914920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confessions and Denials When Guilty and Innocent: Forensic Patients' Self-Reported Behavior During Police Interviews.
    Volbert R; May L; Hausam J; Lau S
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():168. PubMed ID: 30984043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.
    Alison L; Almond L; Christiansen P; Waring S; Power N; Villejoubert G
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):729-48. PubMed ID: 23042647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social cuing of guilt by anger and of shame by disgust.
    Giner-Sorolla R; Espinosa P
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 21156860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: the importance of social categorizations and guilt probability.
    van Prooijen JW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):715-26. PubMed ID: 16648197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect's perceived guilt and criminality.
    Dixon JA; Mahoney B
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 14760965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of anger, guilt, and envy on moral hypocrisy.
    Polman E; Ruttan RL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 38(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 21918064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".
    Seymour TL; Seifert CM; Shafto MG; Mosmann AL
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Feb; 85(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 10740954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.