118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34320419)
1. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of soft tissue artifacts on multi-segment foot kinematics.
Schallig W; Streekstra GJ; Hulshof CM; Kleipool RP; Dobbe JGG; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM; van den Noort JC
J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110359. PubMed ID: 33730563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation.
Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG
Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model.
Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.
Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L
J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.
Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity.
McCahill J; Stebbins J; Koning B; Harlaar J; Theologis T
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():86-89. PubMed ID: 29310014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multi-segment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy.
Shultz R; Kedgley AE; Jenkyn TR
Gait Posture; 2011 May; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21498078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kinematic repeatability of a multi-segment foot model for dance.
Carter SL; Sato N; Hopper LS
Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28730921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation are representative surrogate measures of foot function in asymptomatic adults during walking.
Eichelberger P; Pohl J; Jaspers T; Ferraro M; Krause F; Baur H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208175. PubMed ID: 30517158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.
Saraswat P; MacWilliams BA; Davis RB
Gait Posture; 2012 Apr; 35(4):547-55. PubMed ID: 22192872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new alignment device for standardization of marker placement on the hindfoot.
Campos S; Salami F; Karrasch M; Musagara AR; Hagmann S; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():116-119. PubMed ID: 37379737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.
Brown JA; Gale T; Anderst W
J Biomech; 2020 Aug; 109():109951. PubMed ID: 32807312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D Multi-segment foot kinematics in children: A developmental study in typically developing boys.
Deschamps K; Staes F; Peerlinck K; Van Geet C; Hermans C; Matricali GA; Lobet S
Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():40-44. PubMed ID: 27866014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
