These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34320419)

  • 1. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
    Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
    J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
    Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
    Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
    Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of soft tissue artifacts on multi-segment foot kinematics.
    Schallig W; Streekstra GJ; Hulshof CM; Kleipool RP; Dobbe JGG; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM; van den Noort JC
    J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110359. PubMed ID: 33730563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
    Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation.
    Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG
    Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
    Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
    Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model.
    Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R
    Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.
    Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
    McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
    Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.
    Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
    Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity.
    McCahill J; Stebbins J; Koning B; Harlaar J; Theologis T
    Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():86-89. PubMed ID: 29310014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multi-segment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy.
    Shultz R; Kedgley AE; Jenkyn TR
    Gait Posture; 2011 May; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21498078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic repeatability of a multi-segment foot model for dance.
    Carter SL; Sato N; Hopper LS
    Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28730921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation are representative surrogate measures of foot function in asymptomatic adults during walking.
    Eichelberger P; Pohl J; Jaspers T; Ferraro M; Krause F; Baur H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208175. PubMed ID: 30517158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.
    Saraswat P; MacWilliams BA; Davis RB
    Gait Posture; 2012 Apr; 35(4):547-55. PubMed ID: 22192872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new alignment device for standardization of marker placement on the hindfoot.
    Campos S; Salami F; Karrasch M; Musagara AR; Hagmann S; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():116-119. PubMed ID: 37379737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.
    Brown JA; Gale T; Anderst W
    J Biomech; 2020 Aug; 109():109951. PubMed ID: 32807312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D Multi-segment foot kinematics in children: A developmental study in typically developing boys.
    Deschamps K; Staes F; Peerlinck K; Van Geet C; Hermans C; Matricali GA; Lobet S
    Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():40-44. PubMed ID: 27866014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.