These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34321488)

  • 1. Spanish electoral archive. SEA database.
    Pérez V; Aybar C; Pavía JM
    Sci Data; 2021 Jul; 8(1):193. PubMed ID: 34321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dataset of Historical Elections in Catalonia (DHEC): Micro-level Historical Results (1890-1923).
    Vall-Prat P
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107017. PubMed ID: 33937453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.
    Fortin-Rittberger J; Harfst P; Dingler SC
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2017 Jul; 27(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 28824703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensuring Equitable Access to Participation in the Electoral Process: A Policy Brief From the American College of Physicians.
    Cline K; Hilden D; Beachy M;
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jan; 177(1):68-69. PubMed ID: 38145572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-election survey data: Local democracy and the 2018 local elections in the Czech Republic.
    Šaradín P; Lebeda T; Lysek J; Soukop M; Ostrá D; Lebedová E
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107039. PubMed ID: 34013001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The (un)making of electoral transparency through technology: The 2017 Kenyan presidential election controversy.
    Passanti C; Pommerolle ME
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Dec; 52(6):928-953. PubMed ID: 36154350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The European NUTS-level election dataset: A tool to map European electoral geography.
    Schraff D; Vergioglou I; Demirci BB
    Party Politics; 2023 May; 29(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 37179660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of 2020 French municipal elections on the spread of COVID-19.
    Cassan G; Sangnier M
    J Popul Econ; 2022; 35(3):963-988. PubMed ID: 35345551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Sci Adv; 2021 Apr; 7(17):. PubMed ID: 33883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.
    Tang OY; Wong KE; Ganguli R; Zahiri K; Burns NM; Paracha S; Kozel G; Tang KP; Schuur JD
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.
    Thompson DM; Wu JA; Yoder J; Hall AB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(25):14052-14056. PubMed ID: 32518108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout.
    Pettigrew S
    Elect Stud; 2021 Jun; 71():102188. PubMed ID: 32839636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Turnout and Territorial Reform: Data from Sub municipal governments in Portugal.
    Rodrigues M; Tavares A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105598. PubMed ID: 32395578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When endocrinology and democracy collide: emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections.
    Waismel-Manor I; Ifergane G; Cohen H
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Nov; 21(11):789-95. PubMed ID: 21482457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Political and affective polarisation in a democracy in crisis: The E-Dem panel survey dataset (Spain, 2018-2019).
    Torcal M; Santana A; Carty E; Comellas JM
    Data Brief; 2020 Oct; 32():106059. PubMed ID: 32885001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too afraid to vote? The effects of COVID-19 on voting behaviour.
    Fernandez-Navia T; Polo-Muro E; Tercero-Lucas D
    Eur J Polit Econ; 2021 Sep; 69():102012. PubMed ID: 34511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.