These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34321582)

  • 1. Improvement of an additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization.
    Carnicero A; Peláez A; Restoy-Lozano A; Jacquott I; Perera R
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15390. PubMed ID: 34321582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additively Manufactured Lattice-like Subperiosteal Implants for Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Ridge.
    Bai L; Zheng L; Ji P; Wan H; Zhou N; Liu R; Wang C
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2022 Feb; 8(2):912-920. PubMed ID: 34984904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis.
    De Moor E; Huys SEF; van Lenthe GH; Mommaerts MY; Vander Sloten J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar; 51(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 34059405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Custom-made additively manufactured subperiosteal implant.
    Strappa EM; Memè L; Cerea M; Roy M; Bambini F
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2022 Dec; 71(6):353-360. PubMed ID: 36345834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Submodelling approach to screw-to-bone interaction in additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structures.
    Castrillo G; Carnicero A; Perera R
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Feb; 39(2):e3672. PubMed ID: 36541118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Topological design and biomechanical evaluation for 3D printed multi-segment artificial vertebral implants.
    Kang J; Dong E; Li X; Guo Z; Shi L; Li D; Wang L
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Aug; 127():112250. PubMed ID: 34225889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis.
    Haque F; Luscher AF; Mitchell KS; Sutradhar A
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 37887630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design, manufacture, and fatigue analysis of lightweight hip implants.
    Delikanli YE; Kayacan MC
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2019; 17(2):2280800019836830. PubMed ID: 31119980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla.
    Altıparmak N; Polat S; Onat S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101290. PubMed ID: 36152972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of experimental compressive axial loading testing with a numerical simulation of topologically optimized cervical implants made by selective laser melting.
    Schnitzer M; Hudák R; Sedlačko P; Rajťúková V; Findrik Balogová A; Živčák J; Kula T; Bocko J; Džupon M; Ižaríková G; Karásek M; Filip V; Ivančová E; Šajty M; Szedlák P; Somoš A
    J Biotechnol; 2020 Oct; 322():33-42. PubMed ID: 32673686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design Criteria for Patient-specific Mandibular Continuity Defect Reconstructed Implant with Lightweight Structure using Weighted Topology Optimization and Validated with Biomechanical Fatigue Testing.
    Lin CL; Wang YT; Chang CM; Wu CH; Tsai WH
    Int J Bioprint; 2022; 8(1):437. PubMed ID: 35187275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterials.
    Kolken HMA; Garcia AF; Du Plessis A; Rans C; Mirzaali MJ; Zadpoor AA
    Acta Biomater; 2021 May; 126():511-523. PubMed ID: 33711528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials: The effects of topology and material type.
    Ahmadi SM; Hedayati R; Li Y; Lietaert K; Tümer N; Fatemi A; Rans CD; Pouran B; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Jan; 65():292-304. PubMed ID: 29127065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of design and postprocessing parameters on the degradation behavior and mechanical properties of additively manufactured magnesium scaffolds.
    Kopp A; Derra T; Müther M; Jauer L; Schleifenbaum JH; Voshage M; Jung O; Smeets R; Kröger N
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Oct; 98():23-35. PubMed ID: 30959185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A subperiosteal maxillary implant causing severe osteolysis.
    Nguyen TM; Caruhel JB; Khonsari RH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 119(6):523-525. PubMed ID: 29940264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An innovative additively manufactured implant for mandibular injuries: Design and preparation processes based on simulation model.
    Zheng L; Wang C; Hu M; Apicella A; Wang L; Zhang M; Fan Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1065971. PubMed ID: 36507282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In silico evaluation of lattice designs for additively manufactured total hip implants.
    Izri Z; Bijanzad A; Torabnia S; Lazoglu I
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105353. PubMed ID: 35245699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite Element Analysis of Orthopedic Hip Implant with Functionally Graded Bioinspired Lattice Structures.
    Kladovasilakis N; Tsongas K; Tzetzis D
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 32932596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants.
    Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.