These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34321771)
1. Is Diagnosis of Low-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Possible in Urine Cytology? Bansal S; Pathuthara S; Joseph S; Dighe S; Menon S; Desai SB J Cytol; 2021; 38(2):64-68. PubMed ID: 34321771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upper tract urinary cytology to detect upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Using the Johns Hopkins Hospital template and evaluation of its feasibility. Chen L; He H; Zarka MA; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C Cytojournal; 2015; 12():17. PubMed ID: 26288652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a consistent cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytologic specimens possible? A comparison between cytomorphologic features of low-grade urothelial carcinoma and non-neoplastic changes shows extensive overlap, making a reliable diagnosis impossible. McCroskey Z; Kliethermes S; Bahar B; Barkan GA; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 31051715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic significance of dual immunocytochemical staining of p53/cytokeratin20 on liquid-based urine cytology to detect urothelial carcinoma. Choi SY; Kim KH; Suh KS; Yeo MK Cytojournal; 2020; 17():3. PubMed ID: 32256669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Causes of false-negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology. Lee PJ; Owens CL; Lithgow MY; Jiang Z; Fischer AH Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 27781412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category. Celik B; Kavas G Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of the Paris System in Urine Cytology for Improved Screening of High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma in Bahrain. Mahmoud Daoud R; Ali AH; Salim Fredericks S; Daoud S; Gomaa HR; AlHashimi FS Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57189. PubMed ID: 38681345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High apoptotic index in urine cytology is associated with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Yang CS; Chen S; Cramer HM; Wu HH Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Aug; 124(8):546-51. PubMed ID: 27070653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of a comprehensive, urothelial carcinoma-specific next-generation sequencing panel in urine cytology and bladder tumor specimens. Sun T; Hutchinson L; Tomaszewicz K; Caporelli ML; Meng X; McCauley K; Fischer AH; Cosar EF; Cornejo KM Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 129(7):537-547. PubMed ID: 33539671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytomorphological characteristics of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in voided urine samples: Distinction from benign and high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Takeda K; Adeniran AJ; Levi AW; Tang H; Cai G Cytopathology; 2024 Nov; 35(6):724-732. PubMed ID: 38992916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a Machine Learning Algorithm for Identifying Abnormal Urothelial Cells: A Feasibility Study. Zhang Z; Fu X; Liu J; Huang Z; Liu N; Fang F; Rao J Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 33022673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection. Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytologic and cystoscopic predictors of recurrence and progression in patients with low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Jackson J; Barkan GA; Kapur U; Wojcik EM Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 23364860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual immunocytochemical staining of annexin A10 and p53 in low-grade and papillary urothelial carcinoma contributes to improvement of diagnostic accuracy in urine cytology. Kobayashi G; Hayashi T; Sentani K; Uraoka N; Shibata J; Nobuhiro R; Saito Y; Ishida K; Kaneko Y; Ikeda K; Hanamoto M; Nose H; Arihiro K; Hinata N; Oue N Cancer Cytopathol; 2023 Sep; 131(9):548-560. PubMed ID: 37300383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Template on urine cytology. Wu HH; Redelman M; Chen S; Grignon DJ; Cramer HM Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 25721938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights Into Clinical Behavior and Prognostic Implications Compared to Pure Low-Grade and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinomas. Khalatbari F; Moafi-Madani M; Amin A Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Dec; 148(12):1352-1357. PubMed ID: 38432312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic significance of atypical category in the voided urine samples: A retrospective study in a tertiary care center. Mokhtar GA; Al-Dousari M; Al-Ghamedi D Urol Ann; 2010 Sep; 2(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 20981196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and interobserver variability of the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytology specimens. McCroskey Z; Pambuccian SE; Kleitherms S; Antic T; Cohen MB; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 26572997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology. Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional cell groups with disordered nuclei and cellular discohesion (3DDD) are associated with high sensitivity and specificity for cystoscopic urine cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade urothelial neoplasia. Mai KT; Ball CG; Kos Z; Belanger EC; Islam S; Sekhon H Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):555-63. PubMed ID: 24273035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]