These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34324084)

  • 41. Detection of Vertical Root Fractures Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Presence and Absence of Gutta-Percha.
    Hekmatian E; Karbasi Kheir M; Fathollahzade H; Sheikhi M
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2018; 2018():1920946. PubMed ID: 30111988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: an integrative review.
    Terrabuio BR; Carvalho CG; Peralta-Mamani M; Santos PSDS; Rubira-Bullen IRF; Rubira CMF
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Jun; 51(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 34235055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Root canal sealers affect artifacts on cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Miyashita H; Asaumi R; Sakamoto A; Kawai T; Igarashi M
    Odontology; 2021 Jul; 109(3):679-686. PubMed ID: 33550479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Shokri A; Vafaee F; Haghighat L; Shahabi S; Farhadian M; Jamalpour MR
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Sep; 22(1):156. PubMed ID: 36057551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV.
    Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; da Paz TD; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160366. PubMed ID: 27910700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Sancho-Puchades M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1222-8. PubMed ID: 25040484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
    Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?
    Moshfeghi M; Safi Y; Różyło-Kalinowska I; Gandomi S
    Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 35765076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 23768878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of Tooth Orientation on the Detection of Vertical Root Fracture in Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Wanderley VA; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1168-1172. PubMed ID: 29866408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image retake rates of cone beam computed tomography in a dental institution.
    Hung K; Hui L; Yeung AWK; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4501-4510. PubMed ID: 32488487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Volumetric analysis of artifacts from fiducial markers under cone beam computed tomography.
    Kuo HY; Lin KL; Hsu CY; Fu PS; Hung CC; Song SJ
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Apr; 19(2):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 38618050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of metal artefacts on subjective perception of image quality of 13 CBCT devices.
    Wanderley VA; Leite AF; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Pauwels R; Müller-García F; Becker K; Oliveira ML; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4457-4466. PubMed ID: 35166942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Khavid A; Mohseni Z; Sadeghi M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 31035955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of Pre- and Post-loading Peri-implant Crestal Bone Levels Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An
    Trivedi A; Trivedi S; Narang H; Sarkar P; Sehdev B; Pendyala G; Gill P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Jan; 23(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 35656662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Artefact expression associated with several cone-beam computed tomographic machines when imaging root filled teeth.
    Vasconcelos KF; Nicolielo LF; Nascimento MC; Haiter-Neto F; Bóscolo FN; Van Dessel J; EzEldeen M; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Int Endod J; 2015 Oct; 48(10):994-1000. PubMed ID: 25307251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Nascimento EHL; Fontenele RC; Mancini AXM; Freitas DQ; Oliveira-Santos C
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2020 Mar; 50(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 32206614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Low-dose Multidetector Computed Tomographic and Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Protocols for Volumetric Measurement of Simulated Periapical Lesions.
    Trindade JL; Liedke GS; Tibúrcio-Machado CDS; Barcelos RCS; Dotto GN; Bier CAS
    J Endod; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1144-1148. PubMed ID: 33901545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
    Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.