BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34325472)

  • 21. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
    Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
    Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simplified technique for polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: combined cotton stacking and finger fracture method.
    Kung WM; Lin MS
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(13-14):1737-42. PubMed ID: 22759077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.
    Ashraf M; Choudhary N; Kamboh UA; Raza MA; Sultan KA; Ghulam N; Hussain SS; Ashraf N
    Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():270. PubMed ID: 35855120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PMMA Cranioplasty Making by Using Оpen-Source CAD Software, PLA Printers, and Silicone Rubber Molds: Technical Note with Two Illustrative Cases.
    Malikov A; Secen AE; Ocal O; Divanlioglu D
    Asian J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 17(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 36120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: A pilot study.
    Basu B; Bhaskar N; Barui S; Sharma V; Das S; Govindarajan N; Hegde P; Perikal PJ; Antharasanahalli Shivakumar M; Khanapure K; Tekkatte Jagannatha A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():132-142. PubMed ID: 33581784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Idema S; Te Slaa S; Verver F; Wolff J; Forouzanfar T; Peerdeman S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):408-411. PubMed ID: 30676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of Customised Polymethyl Methacrylate Implants Fabricated Using 3D Printed Flexible Moulds for Correction of Facial Skeletal Deformities.
    Jain R; Mahendru S; Aggarwal A; Brajesh V; Aulakh HS; Singh S; Jain A; Khazanchi RK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):1981-1985. PubMed ID: 33645954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients.
    Rotaru H; Stan H; Florian IS; Schumacher R; Park YT; Kim SG; Chezan H; Balc N; Baciut M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e169-76. PubMed ID: 22260919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
    Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surgical results of cranioplasty using three-dimensional printing technology.
    Cheng CH; Chuang HY; Lin HL; Liu CL; Yao CH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 May; 168():118-123. PubMed ID: 29549811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Customized cost-effective polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty: a cosmetic comparison with other low-cost methods of cranioplasty.
    Baldia M; Joseph M; Sharma S; Kumar D; Retnam A; Koshy S; Karuppusami R
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):655-667. PubMed ID: 35107617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of locally manufactured patient-specific custom made implants for cranial defects using a silicone mould.
    Vlok AJ; Naidoo S; Kamat AS; Lamprecht D
    S Afr J Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 30264941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
    Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Single Standard Polyvinyl Chloride 3D Skull Model to Create the Polymethyl Methacrylate Cranioplasty Flap: A Novel and Low-Cost Technique.
    Prajapati HP; Singh DK
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38621709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Polymethyl Methacrylate Custom-Made Prosthesis: A Novel Three-Dimension Printing-Aided Fabrication Technique for Cranial and/or Orbital Reconstruction.
    Martinez-Seijas P; Díaz-Galvis LA; Hernando J; Leizaola-Cardesa IO; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gómez-Moreno G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e438-e440. PubMed ID: 29521751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cranioplasty with a low-cost customized polymethylmethacrylate implant using a desktop 3D printer.
    Morales-Gómez JA; Garcia-Estrada E; Leos-Bortoni JE; Delgado-Brito M; Flores-Huerta LE; De La Cruz-Arriaga AA; Torres-Díaz LJ; de León ÁRM
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 130(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 29905512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FEM assisted evaluation of PMMA and Ti6Al4V as materials for cranioplasty resulting mechanical behaviour and the neurocranial protection.
    Tsouknidas A; Maropoulos S; Savvakis S; Michailidis N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2011; 21(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 22072078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Customised Cranioplasty Implant for Decompressive Craniectomy Patients ? A Technical Note.
    Mohammad K
    Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(1):148-150. PubMed ID: 28481392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Customized Technique of Cranioplasty for Patients with Large Skull Defects: A Technical Note.
    Metwali H; Hassanin M; Ibrahim T
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():110-114. PubMed ID: 33422719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.