These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34325650)

  • 1. A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing.
    Pieper D; Heß S; Faggion CM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):157. PubMed ID: 34325650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews.
    Roqué M; Martínez-García L; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P; Bonfill X; Zamora J
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():82. PubMed ID: 33082931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
    Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design.
    Bertizzolo L; Bossuyt P; Atal I; Ravaud P; Dechartres A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e028382. PubMed ID: 30940766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool.
    de Kock S; Stirk L; Ross J; Duffy S; Noake C; Misso K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 37():e18. PubMed ID: 33280626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):159. PubMed ID: 30314530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Ospina M; da Costa BR; Egger M; Saltaji H; Fuentes J; Ha C; Cummings GG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96920. PubMed ID: 24824199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict of interest and risk of bias in systematic reviews on methylphenidate for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study.
    Snellman A; Carlberg S; Olsson L
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):175. PubMed ID: 37752560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessor burden, inter-rater agreement and user experience of the RoB-SPEO tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: An analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.
    Momen NC; Streicher KN; da Silva DTC; Descatha A; Frings-Dresen MHW; Gagliardi D; Godderis L; Loney T; Mandrioli D; Modenese A; Morgan RL; Pachito D; Scheepers PTJ; Sgargi D; Paulo MS; Schlünssen V; Sembajwe G; Sørensen K; Teixeira LR; Tenkate T; Pega F
    Environ Int; 2022 Jan; 158():107005. PubMed ID: 34991265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.