These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

922 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34326619)

  • 1. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
    Levine I; Trindade AJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(26):4194-4207. PubMed ID: 34326619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
    Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.
    Soltani AK; Krishnan K
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 32680792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
    Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
    Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.