463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34327527)
1. Long-term 5-year outcome of the randomized IMPRESS in severe shock trial: percutaneous mechanical circulatory support vs. intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.
Karami M; Eriksen E; Ouweneel DM; Claessen BE; Vis MM; Baan J; Beijk M; Packer EJS; Sjauw KD; Engstrom A; Vlaar A; Lagrand WK; Henriques JPS
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2021 Dec; 10(9):1009-1015. PubMed ID: 34327527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock After the SHOCK-II Trial.
Nan Tie E; Dinh D; Chan W; Clark DJ; Ajani AE; Brennan A; Dagan M; Cohen N; Oqueli E; Freeman M; Hiew C; Shaw JA; Reid CM; Kaye DM; Stub D; Duffy SJ;
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Mar; 191():125-132. PubMed ID: 36682080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella
Frain K; Rees P
Perfusion; 2024 Jan; 39(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 34479465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Unverzagt S; Buerke M; de Waha A; Haerting J; Pietzner D; Seyfarth M; Thiele H; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Prondzinsky R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 2015(3):CD007398. PubMed ID: 25812932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pump for myocardial infarction in patients with or without cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Zheng XY; Wang Y; Chen Y; Wang X; Chen L; Li J; Zheng ZG
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jul; 16(1):148. PubMed ID: 27391391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.
Prondzinsky R; Lemm H; Swyter M; Wegener N; Unverzagt S; Carter JM; Russ M; Schlitt A; Buerke U; Christoph A; Schmidt H; Winkler M; Thiery J; Werdan K; Buerke M
Crit Care Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19770739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.
Thiele H; Schuler G; Neumann FJ; Hausleiter J; Olbrich HG; Schwarz B; Hennersdorf M; Empen K; Fuernau G; Desch S; de Waha S; Eitel I; Hambrecht R; Böhm M; Kurowski V; Lauer B; Minden HH; Figulla HR; Braun-Dullaeus RC; Strasser RH; Rochor K; Maier SK; Möllmann H; Schneider S; Ebelt H; Werdan K; Zeymer U
Am Heart J; 2012 Jun; 163(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 22709745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
Schwarz B; Abdel-Wahab M; Robinson DR; Richardt G
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2016 Nov; 111(8):715-722. PubMed ID: 26596273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial.
Prondzinsky R; Unverzagt S; Russ M; Lemm H; Swyter M; Wegener N; Buerke U; Raaz U; Ebelt H; Schlitt A; Heinroth K; Haerting J; Werdan K; Buerke M
Shock; 2012 Apr; 37(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 22266974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?
Sanborn TA; Sleeper LA; Bates ER; Jacobs AK; Boland J; French JK; Dens J; Dzavik V; Palmeri ST; Webb JG; Goldberger M; Hochman JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3 Suppl A):1123-9. PubMed ID: 10985715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing of initiation of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis.
Cui K; Lyu S; Liu H; Song X; Yuan F; Xu F; Zhang M; Zhang M; Wang W; Zhang D; Tian J; Yan Y; Zhou K; Chen L
Clin Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 31509267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
