These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34328014)
1. Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study. Huang Y; Chen F; Xu G; Huang L; Wan R; Yang L; Chen C Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Aug; 10(8):8607-8616. PubMed ID: 34328014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study. Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy. Kashiwagi K; Inoue N; Yoshida T; Bessyo R; Yoneno K; Imaeda H; Ogata H; Kanai T; Sugino Y; Iwao Y PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174155. PubMed ID: 28328936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Usefulness of polyp and adenoma detection rate in the proximal and distal colon]. Choi SY; Park DI; Lee CK; Cha JM; Lee SH; Whangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jan; 63(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24463283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex. Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sedated Colonoscopy may not be Beneficial for Polyp/Adenoma Detection. Han J; Cao R; Su D; Li Y; Gao C; Wang K; Gao F; Qi X Cancer Control; 2024; 31():10732748241272482. PubMed ID: 39403995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and polyp/adenoma detection rate: a single-site retrospective study in regional Queensland. Wong WJ; Arafat Y; Wang S; Hawes S; Hung K ANZ J Surg; 2020 Mar; 90(3):314-316. PubMed ID: 31957200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy. Gromski MA; Miller CA; Lee SH; Park ES; Lee TH; Park SH; Chung IK; Kim SJ; Hwangbo Y Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1337-42. PubMed ID: 22083333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level. Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trainee colonoscopy quality is influenced by the independent and unobserved performance characteristics of supervising physicians. Mahadev S; Jin Z; Lebwohl B; Rosenberg RM; Garcia-Carrasquillo RJ; Ramirez I; Freedberg DE Endosc Int Open; 2019 Jan; 7(1):E74-E82. PubMed ID: 30746431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists. Lee JY; Koh M; Lee JH Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Aug; 66(8):2756-2762. PubMed ID: 32808142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit. Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost. Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 32128607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees. Qayed E; Vora R; Levy S; Bostick RM World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Nov; 9(11):540-551. PubMed ID: 29184610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Shan K; Lu H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Xu L; Wang W; Hu C; Xu L BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 33971824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]