These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34328014)
21. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate at endoscopy in a non-screening population. Murphy B; Myers E; O'Shea T; Feeley K; Waldron B Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2295. PubMed ID: 32041974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Association of Trainee Participation in Colonoscopy Procedures With Quality Metrics. Sey M; Cocco S; McDonald C; Hindi Z; Rahman H; Chakraborty D; French K; Alsager M; Siddiqi O; Blier MA; Markandey B; Al Obaid S; Wong A; Siebring V; Brahmania M; Gregor J; Khanna N; Ott M; Qumosani K; Wilson A; Guizzetti L; Yan B; Jairath V JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Aug; 5(8):e2229538. PubMed ID: 36044211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B; Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Withdrawal time of 8 minutes is associated with higher adenoma detection rates in surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer. Jung DH; Lee JI; Huh CW; Kim MJ; Youn YH; Choi YH; Kim BW Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2354-2361. PubMed ID: 32440929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques. Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of sedation type on adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy. Tarhini H; Alrazim A; Ghusn W; Hosni M; Kerbage A; Soweid A; Sharara AI; Mourad F; Francis F; Shaib Y; Barada K; Daniel F Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022; 46(7):101981. PubMed ID: 35728761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. PDR or ADR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy. Leung FW Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):1000-2. PubMed ID: 23735919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lee CK; Park DI; Lee SH; Hwangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Cha JM; Lee BI; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):1094-102. PubMed ID: 21889137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment. Schramm C; Scheller I; Franklin J; Demir M; Kuetting F; Nierhoff D; Goeser T; Toex U; Steffen HM United European Gastroenterol J; 2017 Aug; 5(5):742-749. PubMed ID: 28815039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2-year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China. Zeng L; Chua EG; Xiong Y; Ding S; Ai H; Hou Z; Loke MF; Goh KL; Tay CY; Marshall BJ; Zhu F; Sun D JGH Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):707-712. PubMed ID: 32782960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anesthesia Assistance in Screening Colonoscopy and Adenoma Detection Rate Among Trainees. Krigel A; Patel A; Kaplan J; Kong XF; Garcia-Carrasquillo R; Lebwohl B; Krishnareddy S Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Apr; 65(4):961-968. PubMed ID: 31485995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position. Köksal AŞ; Kalkan IH; Torun S; Taşkıran I; Öztaş E; Kayaçetin E; Şaşmaz N Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):509-12. PubMed ID: 24078934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies? Al-Rifaie A; El-Feki M; Al-Talib I; Abdulwahid M; Hopper A; Thoufeeq M Frontline Gastroenterol; 2020 Jan; 11(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 31886772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates. Qayed E; Shea L; Goebel S; Bostick RM World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 9(5):204-210. PubMed ID: 28572874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies. Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Longer Withdrawal Time Is More Important than Excellent Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy of Adequate Bowel Preparation. Choi JM; Seo JY; Lee J; Han YM; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Apr; 66(4):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 32419115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy according to Indication. Boroff ES; Disbrow M; Crowell MD; Ramirez FC Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2017; 2017():7207595. PubMed ID: 29445393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Colonoscopy scheduling influences adenoma and polyp detection rates. Paeck KH; Heo WJ; Park DI; Kim YH; Lee SH; Lee CK; Eun CS; Han DS Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1647-52. PubMed ID: 24634936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]