These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34328410)

  • 1. Myopic loss aversion or equate-to-differentiate heuristic? A heuristic decision making model for both single and aggregated plays.
    Zhao L; Ye J; Yang L; Li Z; Zhang W; Hu F
    J Gen Psychol; 2023; 150(2):171-188. PubMed ID: 34328410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of uncertainty visualizations on myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle in retirement investment decisions.
    Wesslen R; Karduni A; Markant D; Dou W
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 34570703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.
    Pachur T; Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Mar; 93():44-73. PubMed ID: 28189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.
    Brandstätter E; Gigerenzer G; Hertwig R
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):409-32. PubMed ID: 16637767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cancellation heuristic in intertemporal choice shifts people's time preferences.
    Sengupta A; Savani K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4627. PubMed ID: 35301341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three Theories of Choice and Their Psychology of Losses.
    Lejarraga T; Hertwig R
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Mar; 17(2):334-345. PubMed ID: 34547221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heuristics contribute to sensorimotor decision-making under risk.
    Adkins T; Lewis R; Lee T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 34508307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absolute and relative stability of loss aversion across contexts.
    Spektor MS; Kellen D; Rieskamp J; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Feb; 153(2):454-472. PubMed ID: 38059963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot study of loss aversion for drug and non-drug commodities in cocaine users.
    Strickland JC; Beckmann JS; Rush CR; Stoops WW
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2017 Nov; 180():223-226. PubMed ID: 28922652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay One or Pay All? The Role of Incentive Schemes in Decision Making Across Adulthood.
    Horn SS; Schaltegger T; Best R; Freund AM
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2023 Jan; 78(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 35972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
    Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
    Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the threat of losses makes people explore more than the promise of gains.
    Lejarraga T; Hertwig R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):708-720. PubMed ID: 27620178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monkeys (Sapajus apella and Macaca tonkeana) and great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes) play for the highest bid.
    Broihanne MH; Romain A; Call J; Thierry B; Wascher CAF; De Marco A; Verrier D; Dufour V
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 Aug; 133(3):301-312. PubMed ID: 30589294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are decisions under risk malleable?
    Fong C; McCabe K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Sep; 96(19):10927-32. PubMed ID: 10485928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical decision making in physical therapy - Exploring the 'heuristic' in clinical practice.
    Walston Z; Whelehan DF; O'Shea N
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2022 Dec; 62():102674. PubMed ID: 36272176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Acceptance of Mixed Gambles Is Sensitive to the Range of Gains and Losses Experienced, and "Estimates of Lambda (k) Are Not a Reliable Measure of Loss Aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2021)": Correction.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jan; 151(1):160. PubMed ID: 35238600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No evidence for loss aversion disappearance and reversal in Walasek and Stewart (2015).
    André Q; de Langhe B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2659-2665. PubMed ID: 34166008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion: A drift-diffusion decomposition.
    Zhao WJ; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101331. PubMed ID: 32777328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptance of mixed gambles is sensitive to the range of gains and losses experienced, and estimates of lambda (λ) are not a reliable measure of loss aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2020).
    Walasek L; Mullett TL; Stewart N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2666-2670. PubMed ID: 35025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.