207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34329371)
1. Ipsilateral and Simultaneous Comparison of Responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitors.
Nemes R; Lengyel S; Nagy G; Hampton DR; Gray M; Renew JR; Tassonyi E; Fülesdi B; Brull SJ
Anesthesiology; 2021 Oct; 135(4):597-611. PubMed ID: 34329371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans.
Liang SS; Stewart PA; Phillips S
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 23821356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block using acceleromyography at the trapezius versus the adductor pollicis muscle: an observational trial.
Soltesz S; Stark C; Noé KG; Anapolski M; Mencke T
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 63(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 26864194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Contralateral Acceleromyography and Electromyography for Posttetanic Count Measurement.
Joo H; Cho S; Lee JW; Kim WJ; Lee HJ; Woo JH; Lee G; Baik HJ
Anesthesiology; 2023 Mar; 138(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 36520831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison Between the Adductor Pollicis Muscle Using TOF-Watch SX and the Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscle Using TetraGraph in Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: A Prospective Observational Study.
Iwasaki H; Yamamoto M; Sato H; Doshu-Kajiura A; Kitajima O; Takagi S; Luthe SK; Suzuki T
Anesth Analg; 2022 Aug; 135(2):370-375. PubMed ID: 35061641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of kinemyography and electromyography during spontaneous recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
Khandkar C; Liang S; Phillips S; Lee CY; Stewart PA
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 Nov; 44(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 27832563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceleromyography improves detection of residual neuromuscular blockade in children.
Ansermino JM; Sanderson PM; Bevan JC; Bevan DR
Can J Anaesth; 1996 Jun; 43(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 8773866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of preload on electromyographic train-of-four ratio at the first dorsal interosseous muscle during spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Bansal A; Stewart PA; Phillips S; Liang S; Wang X
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2018 Nov; 46(6):614-619. PubMed ID: 30447672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function.
Murphy GS; Szokol JW; Avram MJ; Greenberg SB; Shear TD; Deshur M; Benson J; Newmark RL; Maher CE
Anesthesiology; 2018 Nov; 129(5):880-888. PubMed ID: 30130260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex-related differences in the relationship between acceleromyographic adductor pollicis train-of-four ratio and clinical manifestations of residual neuromuscular block: a study in healthy volunteers during near steady-state infusion of mivacurium.
Heier T; Feiner JR; Wright PM; Ward T; Caldwell JE
Br J Anaesth; 2012 Mar; 108(3):444-51. PubMed ID: 22201183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation.
Kopman AF; Chin W; Cyriac J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15752395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of accelerometric monitoring by TOF Watch® SX and electromyographic monitoring by Tetragraph® for recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Giudici G; Piccioni F; Proto P; Valenza F
J Clin Anesth; 2021 Dec; 75():110481. PubMed ID: 34388509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between normalized adductor pollicis train-of-four ratio and manifestations of residual neuromuscular block: a study using acceleromyography during near steady-state concentrations of mivacurium.
Heier T; Caldwell JE; Feiner JR; Liu L; Ward T; Wright PM
Anesthesiology; 2010 Oct; 113(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 20808216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission by electromyography during anaesthesia. A comparison with mechanomyography in cat and man.
Engbaek J
Dan Med Bull; 1996 Sep; 43(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 8884132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of electromyography and kinemyography during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
Stewart PA; Freelander N; Liang S; Heller G; Phillips S
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2014 May; 42(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 24794479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Counting train-of-four twitch response: comparison of palpation to mechanomyography, acceleromyography, and electromyography.
Bowdle A; Bussey L; Michaelsen K; Jelacic S; Nair B; Togashi K; Hulvershorn J
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):712-717. PubMed ID: 32228867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography.
Claudius C; Skovgaard LT; Viby-Mogensen J
Br J Anaesth; 2010 Sep; 105(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 20595196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade.
Bowdle A; Bussey L; Michaelsen K; Jelacic S; Nair B; Togashi K; Hulvershorn J
Anaesthesia; 2020 Feb; 75(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31617199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The implementation of quantitative electromyographic neuromuscular monitoring in an academic anesthesia department.
Todd MM; Hindman BJ; King BJ
Anesth Analg; 2014 Aug; 119(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 24878683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of neuromuscular block measured by compressomyography at the upper arm and electromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle in obese and non-obese patients: An observational study.
Honing GHM; Torensma B; Martini CH; Hoek KB; van Velzen M; Olofsen E; Niesters M; Dahan A; Boon M
J Clin Anesth; 2022 Jun; 78():110673. PubMed ID: 35134618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
