164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34329836)
21. Analysis of clinicopathologic prognostic factors for 157 uterine sarcomas and evaluation of a grading score validated for soft tissue sarcoma.
Pautier P; Genestie C; Rey A; Morice P; Roche B; Lhommé C; Haie-Meder C; Duvillard P
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10717626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Subgrouping and grading of soft-tissue sarcomas by fine-needle aspiration cytology: a histopathologic correlation study.
Palmer HE; Mukunyadzi P; Culbreth W; Thomas JR
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 May; 24(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 11335959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT imaging improves histopathological grading of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas.
Mcaddy NC; Hallin M; Strauss D; Smith M; Hayes A; Yusuf S; Moskovic E; Fotiadis N; van Houdt W; Jones RL; Gronchi A; Thway K; Messiou C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Feb; 46(2):288-292. PubMed ID: 31653457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association of argyrophilic nucleolar organizing regions, Ki-67, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen scores with histologic grade and survival in dogs with soft tissue sarcomas: 60 cases (1996-2002).
Ettinger SN; Scase TJ; Oberthaler KT; Craft DM; McKnight JA; Leibman NF; Charney SC; Bergman PJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Apr; 228(7):1053-62. PubMed ID: 16579784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Grading of soft tissue and bone sarcomas].
Petersen I; Wardelmann E
Pathologe; 2016 Jul; 37(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 27384333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic relevance of a novel proliferation marker, Ki-S11, for soft-tissue sarcoma. A multivariate study.
Rudolph P; Kellner U; Chassevent A; Collin F; Bonichon F; Parwaresch R; Coindre JM
Am J Pathol; 1997 Jun; 150(6):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 9176393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correlating metabolic activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT with histopathologic characteristics of osseous and soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective review of 136 patients.
Rakheja R; Makis W; Skamene S; Nahal A; Brimo F; Azoulay L; Assayag J; Turcotte R; Hickeson M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1409-16. PubMed ID: 22623556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation between cytologic features and histologic grades in cutaneous and subcutaneous soft tissue sarcomas in dogs-A pilot study.
Sanchez-Redondo S; Hare CHZ; Constantino-Casas F; Williams TL
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 50(2):236-239. PubMed ID: 33797110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update.
Coindre JM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Oct; 130(10):1448-53. PubMed ID: 17090186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. YKL-40 expression in soft-tissue sarcomas and atypical lipomatous tumors. An immunohistochemical study of 49 tumors.
Harving ML; Christensen LH; Ringsholt M; Lausten GS; Petersen MM
Acta Orthop; 2014 Apr; 85(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 24650028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How long should we follow patients with soft tissue sarcomas?
Sawamura C; Matsumoto S; Shimoji T; Okawa A; Ae K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):842-8. PubMed ID: 23716116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Head and Neck Region with Skull Base/Intracranial Invasion: Review of Surgical Outcomes and Multimodal Treatment Strategies: A Retrospective Case Series.
Habib A; Edem I; Bell D; Su SY; Hanna EY; Kupferman ME; DeMonte F; Raza SM
Curr Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):6540-6550. PubMed ID: 36135083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative immunohistochemical evaluation of MIB-1 labeling index in adult soft-tissue sarcomas by computer-assisted image analysis.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Matsuno Y
Pathol Int; 2002 Jul; 52(7):433-7. PubMed ID: 12167100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive value of grade for metastasis development in the main histologic types of adult soft tissue sarcomas: a study of 1240 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group.
Coindre JM; Terrier P; Guillou L; Le Doussal V; Collin F; Ranchère D; Sastre X; Vilain MO; Bonichon F; N'Guyen Bui B
Cancer; 2001 May; 91(10):1914-26. PubMed ID: 11346874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can DNA Methylation Profiling Classify Histologic Subtypes and Grades in Soft Tissue Sarcoma?
Kim H; Joo MW; Yoon J; Park HS; Kim JH; Lee JH; Kim SH; Lee SK; Chung YG; Cho YJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Mar; 482(6):1028-37. PubMed ID: 38517415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems.
Oliveira AM; Nascimento AG
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Oct; 30(10):543-59. PubMed ID: 11685477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Yokoyama R; Umeda T; Matsuno Y; Hirohashi S
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(4):843-51. PubMed ID: 12209729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Classification of soft tissue tumors and current approach to pathologic diagnosis].
Nojima T
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Apr; 58(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 20496763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas on fine-needle aspiration cytology smear.
Mallik MK; Dey P; Gupta SK; Vasishta RK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Feb; 38(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19688763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Grading of spindle cell sarcomas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens.
Weir MM; Rosenberg AE; Bell DA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Dec; 112(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 10587701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
