These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34329912)

  • 1. Wildlife-friendly food requires a multi-stakeholder approach to deliver landscape-scale biodiversity conservation in the Satoyama landscape of Japan.
    Sehra KK; MacMillan DC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 297():113275. PubMed ID: 34329912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan.
    Kobori H; Primack RB
    Ambio; 2003 Jun; 32(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 12956598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traditional farming landscapes for sustainable living in Scandinavia and Japan: global revival through the Satoyama initiative.
    Berglund BE; Kitagawa J; Lagerås P; Nakamura K; Sasaki N; Yasuda Y
    Ambio; 2014 Sep; 43(5):559-78. PubMed ID: 24700088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainability of terraced paddy fields in traditional satoyama landscapes of Japan.
    Fukamachi K
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 202(Pt 3):543-549. PubMed ID: 27923517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global identification and mapping of socio-ecological production landscapes with the Satoyama Index.
    Natori Y; Hino A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256327. PubMed ID: 34407125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wildlife-friendly farming recouples grazing regimes to stimulate recovery in semi-arid rangelands.
    Hasselerharm CD; Yanco E; McManus JS; Smuts BH; Ramp D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 788():147602. PubMed ID: 34029808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socio-economic drivers of irrigated paddy land abandonment and agro-ecosystem degradation: Evidence from Japanese agricultural census data.
    Mameno K; Kubo T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266997. PubMed ID: 35421175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological dissimilarity among land-use/land-cover types improves a heterogeneity index for predicting biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.
    Yoshioka A; Fukasawa K; Mishima Y; Sasaki K; Kadoya T
    Ambio; 2017 Dec; 46(8):894-906. PubMed ID: 28573598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agrobiodiversity and in situ conservation in ethnic minority communities of Xishuangbanna in Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
    Shen S; Xu G; Li D; Clements DR; Zhang F; Jin G; Wu J; Wei P; Lin S; Xue D
    J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2017 May; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 28506271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and livelihoods in tropical landscapes: towards a common agenda.
    Schroth G; McNeely JA
    Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 48(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 21706379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designer landscapes for sustainable biofuels.
    Koh LP; Levang P; Ghazoul J
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Aug; 24(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 19497636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale.
    Hodgson JA; Kunin WE; Thomas CD; Benton TG; Gabriel D
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Nov; 13(11):1358-67. PubMed ID: 20825453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bird conservation and the land sharing-sparing continuum in farmland-dominated landscapes of lowland England.
    Finch T; Gillings S; Green RE; Massimino D; Peach WJ; Balmford A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 30900280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond organic farming - harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes.
    Tscharntke T; Grass I; Wanger TC; Westphal C; Batáry P
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2021 Oct; 36(10):919-930. PubMed ID: 34362590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Land-Sparing Agriculture Best Protects Avian Phylogenetic Diversity.
    Edwards DP; Gilroy JJ; Thomas GH; Uribe CA; Haugaasen T
    Curr Biol; 2015 Sep; 25(18):2384-91. PubMed ID: 26344093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach.
    Gonthier DJ; Ennis KK; Farinas S; Hsieh HY; Iverson AL; Batáry P; Rudolphi J; Tscharntke T; Cardinale BJ; Perfecto I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 281(1791):20141358. PubMed ID: 25100703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does environmental certification in coffee promote "business as usual"? A case study from the Western Ghats, India.
    Bose A; Vira B; Garcia C
    Ambio; 2016 Dec; 45(8):946-955. PubMed ID: 27329139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trophy hunters' willingness to pay for wildlife conservation and community benefits.
    Fischer A; Tibebe Weldesemaet Y; Czajkowski M; Tadie D; Hanley N
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 25736833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation.
    Kremen C
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Oct; 1355():52-76. PubMed ID: 26213864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Land sparing to make space for species dependent on natural habitats and high nature value farmland.
    Feniuk C; Balmford A; Green RE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Aug; 286(1909):20191483. PubMed ID: 31455194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.