These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34330172)

  • 41. Experimenter gender and replicability in science.
    Chapman CD; Benedict C; Schiöth HB
    Sci Adv; 2018 Jan; 4(1):e1701427. PubMed ID: 29349293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions?
    Priestley DR; Staph J; Koneru SD; Rajtmajer SM; Cwiek A; Vervoordt S; Hillary FG
    Brain Commun; 2023; 5(1):fcac322. PubMed ID: 36601624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Closing the knowledge-action gap in conservation with open science.
    Roche DG; O'Dea RE; Kerr KA; Rytwinski T; Schuster R; Nguyen VM; Young N; Bennett JR; Cooke SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13835. PubMed ID: 34476839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
    Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2019 Feb; 2(1):e1150. PubMed ID: 32721132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined.
    Haven T; Gopalakrishna G; Tijdink J; van der Schot D; Bouter L
    BMC Res Notes; 2022 Sep; 15(1):302. PubMed ID: 36127719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How open science helps researchers succeed.
    McKiernan EC; Bourne PE; Brown CT; Buck S; Kenall A; Lin J; McDougall D; Nosek BA; Ram K; Soderberg CK; Spies JR; Thaney K; Updegrove A; Woo KH; Yarkoni T
    Elife; 2016 Jul; 5():. PubMed ID: 27387362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reproducible Research: A Retrospective.
    Peng RD; Hicks SC
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2021 Apr; 42():79-93. PubMed ID: 33467923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging.
    Paret C; Unverhau N; Feingold F; Poldrack RA; Stirner M; Schmahl C; Sicorello M
    Neuroimage; 2022 Aug; 257():119306. PubMed ID: 35595201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Open science in psychophysiology: An overview of challenges and emerging solutions.
    Garrett-Ruffin S; Hindash AC; Kaczkurkin AN; Mears RP; Morales S; Paul K; Pavlov YG; Keil A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Apr; 162():69-78. PubMed ID: 33556468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Psychedelic Research and the Need for Transparency: Polishing Alice's Looking Glass.
    Petranker R; Anderson T; Farb N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1681. PubMed ID: 32754101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Guide and Toolbox to Replicability and Open Science in Entomology.
    Wittman JT; Aukema BH
    J Insect Sci; 2020 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 32441307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.
    Farrar BG; Ostojić L; Clayton NS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256607. PubMed ID: 34464406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Rigor and reproducibility for data analysis and design in the study of eating disorders.
    Susanin A; Boyar A; Costello K; Fraiman A; Misrok A; Sears M; Hildebrandt T
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Oct; 55(10):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 35852964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Privacy versus open science.
    Dennis S; Garrett P; Yim H; Hamm J; Osth AF; Sreekumar V; Stone B
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1839-1848. PubMed ID: 31152387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The science-policy relationship in times of crisis: An urgent call for a pragmatist turn.
    Greenhalgh T; Engebretsen E
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Aug; 306():115140. PubMed ID: 35717826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Use of reproducible research practices in public health: A survey of public health analysts.
    Harris JK; Johnson KJ; Carothers BJ; Combs TB; Luke DA; Wang X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202447. PubMed ID: 30208041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Drawing the battle lines: tracing the "Science War" in the construction of the chloroform and human health risks debate.
    Driedger SM; Eyles J
    Environ Manage; 2003 Apr; 31(4):476-88. PubMed ID: 12677294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.
    Gomes DGE; Pottier P; Crystal-Ornelas R; Hudgins EJ; Foroughirad V; Sánchez-Reyes LL; Turba R; Martinez PA; Moreau D; Bertram MG; Smout CA; Gaynor KM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Nov; 289(1987):20221113. PubMed ID: 36416041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview.
    Hales AH; Wesselmann ED; Hilgard J
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2019 Mar; 42(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 31976419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Crisis and Change: The Making of a French FDA.
    Nathanson CA; Bergeron H
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):634-675. PubMed ID: 28895229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.