These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34331118)

  • 1. Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging.
    Mackenzie A; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; van Ongeval C; Cockmartin L; Warren LM; Wilkinson LS; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Young KC
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):806-814. PubMed ID: 34331118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of glandularity on the detection of simulated cancers in planar, tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging of the breast using a hybrid virtual clinical trial.
    Mackenzie A; Kaur S; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; Warren LM; Dance DR; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6859-6868. PubMed ID: 34496038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact on lesion detection via a multi-vendor study: A phantom-based comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6270-6292. PubMed ID: 34407213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
    Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic images in patients with breast cancer.
    Bahadir H
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1444-1448. PubMed ID: 37929519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting?
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):661-670. PubMed ID: 34324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Feb; 54(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30281557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Alakhras MM; Brennan PC; Rickard M; Bourne R; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 25192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdullah P; Alabousi M; Ramadan S; Zawawi I; Zawawi M; Bhogadi Y; Freitas V; Patlas MN; Alabousi A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):314-325. PubMed ID: 32966115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.