These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34331178)

  • 1. Processing Conditional Perfection in Promises and Threats: The Role of Negation, Clause Order and Incentive.
    Zevakhina N; Prigorkina V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 34331178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferences from the negation of counterfactual and semifactual conditionals.
    Espino O; Orenes I; Moreno-Ríos S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1090-1102. PubMed ID: 34846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferences from counterfactual threats and promises.
    Egan SM; Byrne RM
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 22580411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An eye-tracking examination of readers' sensitivity to pragmatic scope information during the processing of conditional inducements.
    Wood JS; Haigh M; Stewart AJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 72(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 29172585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing Attenuating NPIs in Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals.
    Schwab J; Liu M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():894396. PubMed ID: 35756223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice.
    Evans JB; Twyman-Musgrove J
    Cognition; 1998 Nov; 69(1):B11-6. PubMed ID: 9871374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promise is debt, threat another matter: the effect of credibility on the interpretation of conditional promises and threats.
    Verbrugge S; Dieussaert K; Schaeken W; Van Belle W
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 15285600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms.
    Schaeken W; Schroyens W
    Br J Psychol; 2000 Nov; 91 ( Pt 4)():533-50. PubMed ID: 11104177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning.
    van Tiel B; Schaeken W
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():1119-1154. PubMed ID: 27015860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in conditional inference: implications for mental models and mental logic.
    Evans JS; Clibbens J; Rood B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):644-70. PubMed ID: 7568994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditional advice and inducements: are readers sensitive to implicit speech acts during comprehension?
    Haigh M; Stewart AJ; Wood JS; Connell L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 21334582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perisylvian Functional Connectivity during Processing of Sentential Negation.
    Bahlmann J; Mueller JL; Makuuchi M; Friederici AD
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():104. PubMed ID: 21687464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulating "Surprise" with Syntax: A Study on Negative Sentences and Eye-Movement Recording.
    Greco M; Canal P; Bambini V; Moro A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Jun; 49(3):415-434. PubMed ID: 32036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation.
    Espino O; Byrne RMJ
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2459-2501. PubMed ID: 30240030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrary to Expectations: Does Context Influence the Processing Cost Associated with Negation?
    Albu E; Tsaregorodtseva O; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1215-1242. PubMed ID: 34313945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents.
    Clifton C; Frazier L; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1261-1282. PubMed ID: 34363177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negation Cancels Discourse-Level Processing Differences: Evidence from Reading Times in Concession and Result Relations.
    Crible L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1283-1308. PubMed ID: 34363178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of negation on deductive inferences.
    Lea RB; Mulligan EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11911386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancellation, negation, and rejection.
    Skovgaard-Olsen N; Collins P; Krzyżanowska K; Hahn U; Klauer KC
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Feb; 108():42-71. PubMed ID: 30593995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scalar Diversity, Negative Strengthening, and Adjectival Semantics.
    Gotzner N; Solt S; Benz A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1659. PubMed ID: 30271360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.