These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Do pooled estimates from orthodontic meta-analyses change depending on the meta-analysis approach? A meta-epidemiological study. Tatas Z; Koutsiouroumpa O; Seehra J; Mavridis D; Pandis N Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):722-730. PubMed ID: 37435902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Most meta-analyses in oral health do not have conclusive and robust results. Tatas Z; Kyriakou E; Koutsiouroumpa O; Seehra J; Mavridis D; Pandis N J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105309. PubMed ID: 39142375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction intervals should be included in meta-analyses published in dentistry. Faggion CM; Menne MC; Pandis N Eur J Oral Sci; 2021 Dec; 129(6):e12827. PubMed ID: 34865260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of early exaggerated treatment effects in orthodontic interventions using cumulative meta-analysis. Seehra J; Stonehouse-Smith D; Pandis N Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):601-605. PubMed ID: 34184029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are units of analysis properly considered in orthodontic meta-analyses? Mheissen S; Daraqel B; Wafaie K; Khan H Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):795-801. PubMed ID: 37552053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand? Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Eliades T; Pandis N Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 25667037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluation of statistically significant meta-analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung-Knapp method and prediction intervals-A methodological study. Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Rohe MS; Buroh S; Schwarzer G; Becker G Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):330-341. PubMed ID: 34932271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis prediction intervals are under reported in sport and exercise medicine. Borg DN; Impellizzeri FM; Borg SJ; Hutchins KP; Stewart IB; Jones T; Baguley BJ; Orssatto LBR; Bach AJE; Osborne JO; McMaster BS; Buhmann RL; Bon JJ; Barnett AG Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2024 Mar; 34(3):e14603. PubMed ID: 38501202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics. Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Michelaki I; Pandis N J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():90-94. PubMed ID: 29738788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020. Makou O; Eliades T; Koletsi D Eur J Orthod; 2021 Mar; ():567-575. PubMed ID: 33740054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics. Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do sample size calculations in longitudinal orthodontic trials use the advantages of this study design? Mheissen S; Seehra J; Khan H; Pandis N Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):402-408. PubMed ID: 35119470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study. Mheissen S; Khan H; Normando D; Vaiid N; Flores-Mir C PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0298526. PubMed ID: 38502662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries. Graham PL; Moran JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using prediction intervals from random-effects meta-analyses in an economic model. Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran P; Murphy L; Harrington P; Ryan M; Flattery M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24472222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]