161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34332156)
1. Adaptive current-flow models of ECT: Explaining individual static impedance, dynamic impedance, and brain current density.
Unal G; Swami JK; Canela C; Cohen SL; Khadka N; FallahRad M; Short B; Argyelan M; Sackeim HA; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(5):1154-1168. PubMed ID: 34332156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quasi-static pipeline in electroconvulsive therapy computational modeling.
Unal G; Poon C; FallahRad M; Thahsin M; Argyelan M; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(2):607-618. PubMed ID: 36933652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic impedance is correlated with static impedance and seizure quality parameters in bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy.
Exner J; Deuring G; Seifritz E; Brühl AB
Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2023 Jun; 35(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 36803888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.
Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
J ECT; 2013 Dec; 29(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 24263276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric field strength induced by electroconvulsive therapy is associated with clinical outcome.
Fridgeirsson EA; Deng ZD; Denys D; van Waarde JA; van Wingen GA
Neuroimage Clin; 2021; 30():102581. PubMed ID: 33588322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of anatomical variability on electric field characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a parametric modeling study.
Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Jan; 23(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 25055384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation.
Jiang J; Truong DQ; Esmaeilpour Z; Huang Y; Badran BW; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2020 Jan; 17(1):016027. PubMed ID: 31689695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 62(9):2095-105. PubMed ID: 25910001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():815-8. PubMed ID: 24109812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [ECT versus transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): preliminary data of computer modeling].
Zyss T; Krawczyk A; Drzymała P; Starzyński J
Psychiatr Pol; 1999; 33(6):909-23. PubMed ID: 10776027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.
Lee WH; Deng ZD; Kim TS; Laine AF; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2110-23. PubMed ID: 22032945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of electric field strength and spatial distribution of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic human head model.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
Eur Psychiatry; 2016 Aug; 36():55-64. PubMed ID: 27318858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.
Nadeem M; Thorlin T; Gandhi OP; Persson M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 12848358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computational model of direct brain excitation induced by electroconvulsive therapy: comparison among three conventional electrode placements.
Bai S; Loo C; Al Abed A; Dokos S
Brain Stimul; 2012 Jul; 5(3):408-421. PubMed ID: 21962983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing intracranial electric field distribution through temperature-driven scalp conductivity adjustments in transcranial electrical stimulation.
Wang M; Zhang L; Hong W; Luo Y; Li H; Feng Z
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(3):. PubMed ID: 38170996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling transcranial electric stimulation in mouse: a high resolution finite element study.
Bernabei JM; Lee WH; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():406-9. PubMed ID: 25569982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.
Sajib SZK; Katoch N; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2505-2514. PubMed ID: 28767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurocapillary-Modulation.
Khadka N; Bikson M
Neuromodulation; 2022 Dec; 25(8):1299-1311. PubMed ID: 33340187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation.
Bai S; Loo C; Dokos S
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 23510007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of anatomical variability on neural stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST).
Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():682-8. PubMed ID: 19964484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
