155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34332384)
1. Environmental sustainability of a pork and bean stew.
San Miguel G; Ruiz D
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149203. PubMed ID: 34332384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental and economic sustainability of fresh-cut and pre-cooked vegetables.
Rasines L; Morera S; Miguel GS; Artés-Hernández F; Aguayo E
Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 872():162169. PubMed ID: 36775153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the environmental sustainability of alternative post-harvest scenarios for fresh vegetables: A case study in Spain.
Rasines L; Miguel GS; Molina-García Á; Artés-Hernández F; Hontoria E; Aguayo E
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 860():160422. PubMed ID: 36427716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products.
Noya I; Aldea X; Gasol CM; González-García S; Amores MJ; Colón J; Ponsá S; Roman I; Rubio MA; Casas E; Moreira MT; Boschmonart-Rives J
J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 171():133-143. PubMed ID: 26861226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards an environmentally sustainable and healthy Atlantic dietary pattern: Life cycle carbon footprint and nutritional quality.
Esteve-Llorens X; Darriba C; Moreira MT; Feijoo G; González-García S
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():704-715. PubMed ID: 30059930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carbon footprint of Breton pâté production: a case study.
Teixeira R; Himeno A; Gustavus L
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 23801646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eutrophication and climate change impacts of a case study of New Zealand beef to the European market.
Payen S; Falconer S; Carlson B; Yang W; Ledgard S
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 710():136120. PubMed ID: 31927281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental life cycle assessment of nutraceuticals: A case study on methylcobalamin in different packaging types.
Cooreman-Algoed M; Boone L; Uitterhaegen E; Taelman SE; De Soete W; Dewulf J
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Oct; 893():164780. PubMed ID: 37302605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carbon footprint of organic beef meat from farm to fork: a case study of short supply chain.
Vitali A; Grossi G; Martino G; Bernabucci U; Nardone A; Lacetera N
J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Nov; 98(14):5518-5524. PubMed ID: 29691877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental impacts of vegetables consumption in the UK.
Frankowska A; Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 682():80-105. PubMed ID: 31108271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spoilage of fresh turkey and pork sausages: Influence of potassium lactate and modified atmosphere packaging.
Luong NM; Jeuge S; Coroller L; Feurer C; Desmonts MH; Moriceau N; Anthoine V; Gavignet S; Rapin A; Frémaux B; Robieu E; Zagorec M; Membré JM; Guillou S
Food Res Int; 2020 Nov; 137():109501. PubMed ID: 33233145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The carbon footprint of dietary guidelines around the world: a seven country modeling study.
Kovacs B; Miller L; Heller MC; Rose D
Nutr J; 2021 Mar; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33648497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China.
Tong B; Zhang L; Hou Y; Oenema O; Long W; Velthof G; Ma W; Zhang F
Nat Food; 2023 Jan; 4(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 37118572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carbon and blue water footprints of California sheep production.
Dougherty HC; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM; DePeters EJ; Pettey LA; Macon D; Finzel J; Rodrigues K; Kebreab E
J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):945-961. PubMed ID: 30452693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the carbon footprint of different patient diets in a Spanish hospital.
Vidal R; Moliner E; Pikula A; Mena-Nieto A; Ortega A
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2015 Jan; 20(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25300288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The carbon footprint of an Australian satellite haemodialysis unit.
Lim AE; Perkins A; Agar JW
Aust Health Rev; 2013 Jun; 37(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 23731962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs.
Taylor RC; Omed H; Edwards-Jones G
Poult Sci; 2014 Jan; 93(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24570444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
