BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34332496)

  • 1. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
    Patel AS; Isharwal S
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-Port Robotic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer.
    Abdullatif VA; Davis J; Cavayero C; Toenniessen A; Nelson RJ
    Urology; 2022 Mar; 161():153-156. PubMed ID: 34936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Partial Penectomy With Bilateral Robotic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Using Near-infrared Fluorescence Guidance.
    Sávio LF; Panizzutti Barboza M; Alameddine M; Ahdoot M; Alonzo D; Ritch CR
    Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():251. PubMed ID: 29191642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic or open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection as staging procedures for clinically node negative high risk penile cancer.
    Ozambela M; McCormick BZ; Rudzinski JK; Pieretti AC; González GMN; Meissner MA; Papadopoulos JN; Adibi M; Matin SF; Dahmen AS; Spiess PE; Pettaway CA
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):120.e1-120.e9. PubMed ID: 38388244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in men with urethral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Werntz RP; Riedinger CB; Fantus RJ; Smith ZL; Packiam VT; Adamsky MA; Smith N; Steinberg GD
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):526.e1-526.e6. PubMed ID: 30446445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
    Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
    Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
    Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
    J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
    Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
    Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
    Nazzani S; Catanzaro M; Biasoni D; Maccauro M; Stagni S; Torelli T; Macchi A; Bernasconi V; Taverna A; Sessa D; Lorenzoni A; Piva L; Lanocita R; Cascella T; Cattaneo L; Montanari E; Salvioni R; Nicolai N
    Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):210.e1-210.e8. PubMed ID: 36868883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
    Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
    J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penile carcinoma (pT1 G2): surveillance or inguinal lymph node dissection?
    Naumann CM; Filippow N; Seif C; van der Horst C; Roelver L; Braun PM; Juenemann KP; Portillo FJ
    Onkologie; 2005 Mar; 28(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 15772463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using Near-infrared Fluorescence in Vulvar Cancer.
    Mohammad A; Hunter MI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):968-972. PubMed ID: 30959199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Penile Carcinoma.
    Russell CM; Salami SS; Niemann A; Weizer AZ; Tomlins SA; Morgan TM; Montgomery JS
    Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():113-118. PubMed ID: 28450202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
    Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and palpable inguinal nodes.
    Heyns CF; Theron PD
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 18410439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.
    Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J
    BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.
    Chua KJ; Balraj V; Patel HV; Srivastava A; Doppalapudi SK; Elsamra SE; Jang TL; Singer EA; Ghodoussipour SB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 36519902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saphenous-sparing laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
    Chiapparrone G; Rapisarda S; de Concilio B; Zeccolini G; Antoniutti M; Celia A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):645-646. PubMed ID: 29064655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.
    Ercole CE; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 21481617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.