163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34332966)
1. Leadless left ventricular stimulation with WiSE-CRT System - Initial experience and results from phase I of SOLVE-CRT Study (nonrandomized, roll-in phase).
Okabe T; Hummel JD; Bank AJ; Niazi IK; McGrew FA; Kindsvater S; Oza SR; Scherschel JA; Walsh MN; Singh JP
Heart Rhythm; 2022 Jan; 19(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 34332966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system.
Sieniewicz BJ; Betts TR; James S; Turley A; Butter C; Seifert M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S; Neuzil P; Biffi M; Diemberger I; Vergara P; Arnold M; Keane DT; Defaye P; Deharo JC; Chow A; Schilling R; Behar J; Rinaldi CA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1291-1297. PubMed ID: 32165181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.
Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Butter C; Brachmann J; Van Erven L; Spitzer S; Moccetti T; Seifert M; Markou T; Laszo K; Regoli F;
Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 24497573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing: The SELECT-LV Study.
Reddy VY; Miller MA; Neuzil P; Søgaard P; Butter C; Seifert M; Delnoy PP; van Erven L; Schalji M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(17):2119-2129. PubMed ID: 28449772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European experience with a first totally leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker system.
Carabelli A; Jabeur M; Jacon P; Rinaldi CA; Leclercq C; Rovaris G; Arnold M; Venier S; Neuzil P; Defaye P
Europace; 2021 May; 23(5):740-747. PubMed ID: 33313789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of leadless left ventricular septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system to target the left bundle branch area: A porcine model and multicenter patient experience.
Elliott MK; Vergara P; Wijesuriya N; Mehta VS; Bosco P; Jacon P; Lee M; Taloni S; Niederer S; Alison J; Piot O; Roberts PR; Paisey J; Defaye P; Shute A; Rinaldi CA
Heart Rhythm; 2022 Dec; 19(12):1974-1983. PubMed ID: 35940464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing in nonresponders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Sidhu BS; Porter B; Gould J; Sieniewicz B; Elliott M; Mehta V; Delnoy PPHM; Deharo JC; Butter C; Seifert M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S; James S; Turley AJ; Auricchio A; Betts TR; Niederer S; Sanders P; Rinaldi CA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):966-973. PubMed ID: 32330307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.
Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Regoli F; Seifert M; Markou T; Butter C;
Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1191-7. PubMed ID: 23703364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for CRT upgrades in previously failed and high-risk patients in comparison with coronary sinus CRT upgrades.
Sidhu BS; Sieniewicz B; Gould J; Elliott MK; Mehta VS; Betts TR; James S; Turley AJ; Butter C; Seifert M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S; Neuzil P; Biffi M; Diemberger I; Vergara P; Arnold M; Keane DT; Defaye P; Deharo JC; Chow A; Schilling R; Behar JM; Leclercq C; Auricchio A; Niederer SA; Rinaldi CA
Europace; 2021 Oct; 23(10):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 34322707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical feasibility of leadless left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization: a case series.
Elliott MK; Jacon P; Sidhu BS; Smith LJ; Mehta VS; Gould J; Lee AWC; Niederer S; Defaye P; Rinaldi CA
Eur Heart J Case Rep; 2021 Nov; 5(11):ytab379. PubMed ID: 34859181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study.
Biffi M; Defaye P; Jaïs P; Ruffa F; Leclercq C; Gras D; Yang Z; Gerritse B; Ziacchi M; Morgan JM;
Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():88-93. PubMed ID: 29579617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wijesuriya N; Elliott MK; Mehta V; Sidhu BS; Behar JM; Niederer S; Rinaldi CA
Heart Rhythm; 2022 Jul; 19(7):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 35189383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: assessment by pressure-volume loops.
Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Ricciardi G; Perrotta L; Grifoni G; Porciani MC; Lionetti V; Valsecchi S
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 5(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 22589286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study.
Linde C; Gold MR; Abraham WT; St John Sutton M; Ghio S; Cerkvenik J; Daubert C;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Sep; 34(33):2592-9. PubMed ID: 23641006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Left Ventricular Architecture, Long-Term Reverse Remodeling, and Clinical Outcome in Mild Heart Failure With Cardiac Resynchronization: Results From the REVERSE Trial.
St John Sutton M; Linde C; Gold MR; Abraham WT; Ghio S; Cerkvenik J; Daubert JC;
JACC Heart Fail; 2017 Mar; 5(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 28254122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically vs. imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Jensen HK; Fyenbo DB; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 31274152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
