These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34333278)
21. The influence of object similarity on real object-based attention: The disassociation of perceptual and semantic similarity. Hu S; Liu D; Song F; Wang Y; Zhao J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Apr; 205():103046. PubMed ID: 32143062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets. Thomas MD; Williams CC Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceptual training for visual search. Schuster D; Rivera J; Sellers BC; Fiore SM; Jentsch F Ergonomics; 2013; 56(7):1101-15. PubMed ID: 23650877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The contents of perceptual hypotheses: evidence from rapid resumption of interrupted visual search. Jungé JA; Brady TF; Chun MM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):681-9. PubMed ID: 19429951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. No matter how: Top-down effects of verbal and semantic category knowledge on early visual perception. Maier M; Abdel Rahman R Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):859-876. PubMed ID: 30607831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dual-target hazard perception: Could identifying one hazard hinder a driver's capacity to find a second? Sall RJ; Feng J Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():213-224. PubMed ID: 31319363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search. Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual attention in spatial cueing and visual search. Baek J; Dosher BA; Lu ZL J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):1. PubMed ID: 33646298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry? Zacharia AA; Ahuja N; Kaur S; Mehta N; Sharma R Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 32086660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Out of sight, out of mind: Matching bias underlies confirmatory visual search. Rajsic J; Taylor JE; Pratt J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 28000157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of perceptual similarity and category membership on early word-referent identification. Arias-Trejo N; Plunkett K J Exp Child Psychol; 2010; 105(1-2):63-80. PubMed ID: 19931091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search. Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials. Ohkita M; Obayashi Y; Jitsumori M Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():96-105. PubMed ID: 24486515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis. He J; McCarley JS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Attention parameters in visual search tasks in various human age groups]. Baranov-Krylov IN; Kuznetsova TG; Ratnikova VK Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2008 Jun; 94(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 18727371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]