These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34333697)

  • 1. No-go trials in task switching: effects on the task-set and task-space level.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1097-1107. PubMed ID: 34333697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a dynamically changing response set overlap on n - 2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2023 Oct; 87(7):2275-2282. PubMed ID: 36949242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition during task switching is affected by the number of competing tasks.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):211-224. PubMed ID: 37698800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.
    Berger A; Koch I; Kiefer M
    Psychol Res; 2024 Oct; 88(7):2036-2058. PubMed ID: 39080024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors in task switching: Investigating error aftereffects in a N-2 repetition cost paradigm.
    Moretti L; Koch I; Steinhauser M; Schuch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1720-1737. PubMed ID: 34694830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n - 2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):579-588. PubMed ID: 29431022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.
    Jamadar S; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):365-86. PubMed ID: 20003149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further investigating effects of task repetition proportion on
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 32238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating task preparation and task performance as triggers of the backward inhibition effect.
    Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M; Swainson R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1816-1835. PubMed ID: 36571593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task.
    Liepelt R; Wenke D; Fischer R; Prinz W
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):366-75. PubMed ID: 21085984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.
    Grange JA; Juvina I; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2013 Mar; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 22327120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of inhibition in task switching: a review.
    Koch I; Gade M; Schuch S; Philipp AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 20081154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1965-1999. PubMed ID: 31177315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.