These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34333697)

  • 21. Response-repetition costs in task switching: how they are modulated by previous-trial response-category activation.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 22137015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching.
    Costa RE; Friedrich FJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1193-201. PubMed ID: 22918561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of response selection on the task repetition benefit in task switching.
    Koch I; Philipp AM
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jun; 33(4):624-34. PubMed ID: 16248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI.
    Chevrier AD; Noseworthy MD; Schachar R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1347-58. PubMed ID: 17274022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the cognitive processes underlying resumption costs in task-interruption contexts: Decay or inhibition of suspended task goals?
    Hirsch P; Moretti L; Askin S; Koch I
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):271-284. PubMed ID: 37674056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107954. PubMed ID: 32976924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rumination and inhibition in task switching: no evidence for an association.
    Grange JA
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Feb; 37(1):162-181. PubMed ID: 36779814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.
    Lenartowicz A; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task set switching in schizophrenia.
    Meiran N; Levine J; Meiran N; Henik A
    Neuropsychology; 2000 Jul; 14(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 10928748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response-repetition costs reflect changes to the representation of an action.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2146-2154. PubMed ID: 35618943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task.
    Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing.
    Cherkasova MV; Manoach DS; Intriligator JM; Barton JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(4):528-37. PubMed ID: 12037637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters.
    Zhao X; Liu X; Zan X; Jin G; Maes JH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160595. PubMed ID: 27500831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue.
    Wylie GR; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Neuroreport; 2004 Apr; 15(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 15076739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of predictive cuing on response inhibition in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.
    O'Brien JW; Norman AL; Fryer SL; Tapert SF; Paulus MP; Jones KL; Riley EP; Mattson SN
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2013 Apr; 37(4):644-54. PubMed ID: 23094678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.
    Sohn MH; Carlson RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1445-60. PubMed ID: 11185776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.