BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34335694)

  • 21. Transcriptome profiling reveals the effects of drought tolerance in Giant Juncao.
    Zhou J; Chen S; Shi W; David-Schwartz R; Li S; Yang F; Lin Z
    BMC Plant Biol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):2. PubMed ID: 33390157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transcriptome analysis and differential gene expression profiling of two contrasting quinoa genotypes in response to salt stress.
    Shi P; Gu M
    BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):568. PubMed ID: 33380327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unigene-based RNA-seq provides insights on drought stress responses in Marsdenia tenacissima.
    Meng HL; Zhang W; Zhang GH; Wang JJ; Meng ZG; Long GQ; Yang SC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0202848. PubMed ID: 30500823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative transcriptome meta-analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought and cold stress.
    Sharma R; Singh G; Bhattacharya S; Singh A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203266. PubMed ID: 30192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Analysis of the Brassica napus Root and Leaf Transcript Profiling in Response to Drought Stress.
    Liu C; Zhang X; Zhang K; An H; Hu K; Wen J; Shen J; Ma C; Yi B; Tu J; Fu T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Aug; 16(8):18752-77. PubMed ID: 26270661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transcriptome sequencing of the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) and identification of differentially expressed genes involved in drought stress.
    Liu J; Deng JL; Tian Y
    Phytochemistry; 2020 Mar; 171():112226. PubMed ID: 31923721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transcriptome profiling of Gerbera hybrida reveals that stem bending is caused by water stress and regulation of abscisic acid.
    Ge Y; Lai Q; Luo P; Liu X; Chen W
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Jul; 20(1):600. PubMed ID: 31331262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. De Novo Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of Schima superba Seedlings to Explore the Response to Drought Stress.
    Han BC; Wei W; Mi XC; Ma KP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0166975. PubMed ID: 27930677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whole-genome characterization of Rosa chinensis AP2/ERF transcription factors and analysis of negative regulator RcDREB2B in Arabidopsis.
    Li W; Geng Z; Zhang C; Wang K; Jiang X
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 33509074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis-based identification of key modules and hub genes associated with drought sensitivity in rice.
    Yu B; Liu J; Wu D; Liu Y; Cen W; Wang S; Li R; Luo J
    BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):478. PubMed ID: 33081724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative transcriptomic and physiological analyses of contrasting hybrid cultivars ND476 and ZX978 identify important differentially expressed genes and pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize.
    Liu G; Zenda T; Liu S; Wang X; Jin H; Dong A; Yang Y; Duan H
    Genes Genomics; 2020 Aug; 42(8):937-955. PubMed ID: 32623576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cotyledonary somatic embryo is one kind of intermediate material similar to callus in the process of in vitro tissue culture from Rosa hybrida 'John F. Kennedy'.
    Du L; Kang X; Guo H; Zhu Z; Wu R; Yuan M; Ding C
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):362. PubMed ID: 38609856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of drought and salt-stresses on gene expression in Caragana korshinskii seedlings revealed by RNA-seq.
    Li S; Fan C; Li Y; Zhang J; Sun J; Chen Y; Tian C; Su X; Lu M; Liang C; Hu Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():200. PubMed ID: 26951633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrated Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Plant Hormones Jasmonic Acid and Salicylic Acid Coordinate Growth and Defense Responses upon Fungal Infection in Poplar.
    Luo J; Xia W; Cao P; Xiao Z; Zhang Y; Liu M; Zhan C; Wang N
    Biomolecules; 2019 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30609760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. De novo transcriptome assembly and co-expression network analysis of Cynanchum thesioides: Identification of genes involved in resistance to drought stress.
    Zhang X; Yang Z; Li Z; Zhang F; Hao L
    Gene; 2019 Aug; 710():375-386. PubMed ID: 31200084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined analyses of transcriptome and metabolome reveal the mechanism of exogenous strigolactone regulating the response of elephant grass to drought stress.
    Zhou J; Liu Y; Li Y; Ling W; Fan X; Feng Q; Ming R; Yang F
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1186718. PubMed ID: 37223793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative transcriptome sequencing of tolerant rice introgression line and its parents in response to drought stress.
    Huang L; Zhang F; Zhang F; Wang W; Zhou Y; Fu B; Li Z
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):1026. PubMed ID: 25428615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transcriptome profiling analysis revealed co-regulation of multiple pathways in jujube during infection by 'Candidatus Phytoplasma ziziphi'.
    Wang H; Ye X; Li J; Tan B; Chen P; Cheng J; Wang W; Zheng X; Feng J
    Gene; 2018 Jul; 665():82-95. PubMed ID: 29709641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of putative drought-responsive genes in rice using gene co-expression analysis.
    Lv Y; Xu L; Dossa K; Zhou K; Zhu M; Xie H; Tang S; Yu Y; Guo X; Zhou B
    Bioinformation; 2019; 15(7):480-489. PubMed ID: 31485134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transcriptome analysis of Crossostephium chinensis provides insight into the molecular basis of salinity stress responses.
    Yang H; Sun M; Lin S; Guo Y; Yang Y; Zhang T; Zhang J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187124. PubMed ID: 29131853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.