These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34336802)
1. Design and Evaluation of the Initial 50th Percentile Female Prototype Rear Impact Dummy, BioRID P50F - Indications for the Need of an Additional Dummy Size. Carlsson A; Davidsson J; Linder A; Svensson MY Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():687058. PubMed ID: 34336802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration. Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests. Croft AC; Philippens MM Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion of the head and neck of female and male volunteers in rear impact car-to-car impacts. Carlsson A; Siegmund GP; Linder A; Svensson MY Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 22817553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic Responses of Female Volunteers in Rear Impact Sled Tests at Two Head Restraint Distances. Carlsson A; Horion S; Davidsson J; Schick S; Linder A; Hell W; Svensson MY Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():684003. PubMed ID: 34169067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Rear Impact Biofidelity of BioRID II and RID2. Philippens M; Cappon H; van Ratingen M; Wismans J; Svensson M; Sirey F; Ono K; Nishimoto N; Matsuoka F Stapp Car Crash J; 2002 Nov; 46():461-76. PubMed ID: 17096238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests. Carlsson A; Linder A; Davidsson J; Hell W; Schick S; Svensson M Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 21823943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built. Zhang X; Zhou Q Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26148123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The repeatability and reproducibility of the BioRID IIg in a repeatable laboratory seat based on a production car seat. Hynd D; Depinet P; Lorenz B Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S95-104. PubMed ID: 23905679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled. Viano DC; Parenteau CS Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the internal and external biofidelity of current rear impact ATDs to response targets developed from moderate-speed rear impacts of PMHS. Moorhouse K; Donnelly B; Kang YS; Bolte JH; Herriott R Stapp Car Crash J; 2012 Oct; 56():171-229. PubMed ID: 23625562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cervical vertebrae rotations for PMHS and BioRID II in rear impacts. Kang YS; Moorhouse K; Herriott R; Bolte JH Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S136-47. PubMed ID: 23905990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison Tests of BioRID II and RID 2 with Regard to Repeatability, Reproducibility and Sensitivity for Assessment of Car Seat Protection Potential in Rear-End Impacts. Bortenschlager K; Kramberger D; Barnsteiner K; Hartlieb M; Ferdinand L; Leyer H; Muser M; Schmitt KU Stapp Car Crash J; 2003 Oct; 47():473-88. PubMed ID: 17096261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of the Hybrid III and BioRID II Dummies in Low-Severity, Rear-Impact Sled Tests. Kim A; Anderson KF; Berliner J; Bryzik C; Hassan J; Jensen J; Kendall M; Mertz HJ; Morrow T; Rao A; Wozniak JA Stapp Car Crash J; 2001 Nov; 45():257-84. PubMed ID: 17458749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC). Boström O; Fredriksson R; Håland Y; Jakobsson L; Krafft M; Lövsund P; Muser MH; Svensson MY Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 10688488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests. Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests. Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the BioRID P3 and the Hybrid III in pendulum impacts to the back--a comparison to human subject test data. Linder A; Bergman U; Svensson M; Viano D Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2000; 44():283-97. PubMed ID: 11558088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]