BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34339418)

  • 1. Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies.
    Deng Y; Pan W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009266. PubMed ID: 34339418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal Inference in Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies with Invalid Instruments and GWAS Summary Data.
    Xue H; Shen X; Pan W
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2023; 118(543):1525-1537. PubMed ID: 37808547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring causal direction between two traits in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.
    Xue H; Pan W
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Nov; 16(11):e1009105. PubMed ID: 33137120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining the strengths of inverse-variance weighting and Egger regression in Mendelian randomization using a mixture of regressions model.
    Lin Z; Deng Y; Pan W
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Nov; 17(11):e1009922. PubMed ID: 34793444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies.
    Yuan Z; Zhu H; Zeng P; Yang S; Sun S; Yang C; Liu J; Zhou X
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3861. PubMed ID: 32737316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
    Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constrained maximum likelihood-based Mendelian randomization robust to both correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects.
    Xue H; Shen X; Pan W
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jul; 108(7):1251-1269. PubMed ID: 34214446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust inference of bi-directional causal relationships in presence of correlated pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.
    Xue H; Pan W
    PLoS Genet; 2022 May; 18(5):e1010205. PubMed ID: 35576237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practical problem with Egger regression in Mendelian randomization.
    Lin Z; Pan I; Pan W
    PLoS Genet; 2022 May; 18(5):e1010166. PubMed ID: 35507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
    Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust two-sample transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics.
    Gleason KJ; Yang F; Chen LS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 45(4):353-371. PubMed ID: 33834509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendelian randomization accounting for complex correlated horizontal pleiotropy while elucidating shared genetic etiology.
    Cheng Q; Zhang X; Chen LS; Liu J
    Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):6490. PubMed ID: 36310177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-trait transcriptome-wide association studies with probabilistic Mendelian randomization.
    Liu L; Zeng P; Xue F; Yuan Z; Zhou X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Feb; 108(2):240-256. PubMed ID: 33434493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of selection bias on two sample summary data based Mendelian randomization.
    Wang K; Han S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7585. PubMed ID: 33828182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.