193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34339928)
1. Comparison of
Craig AJ; Murray I; Denis-Bacelar AM; Rojas B; Gear JI; Hossen L; Maenhout A; Khan N; Flux GD
Phys Med; 2021 Sep; 89():1-10. PubMed ID: 34339928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of absorbed doses to the tumoral and non-tumoral liver in HCC patients undergoing
Noipinit N; Sukprakun C; Siricharoen P; Khamwan K
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Mar; 38(3):210-218. PubMed ID: 38142421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Debebe SA; Adjouadi M; Gulec SA; Franquiz J; McGoron AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):30-42. PubMed ID: 30628156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D image-based dosimetry for Yttrium-90 radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of imaging method on absorbed dose estimates.
Brosch J; Gosewisch A; Kaiser L; Seidensticker M; Ricke J; Zellmer J; Bartenstein P; Ziegler S; Ilhan H; Todica A; Böning G
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():317-326. PubMed ID: 33248338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Tabotta F; Gnesin S; Dunet V; Ponti A; Digklia A; Boughdad S; Schaefer N; Prior JO; Villard N; Tsoumakidou G; Denys A; Duran R
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13118. PubMed ID: 37573346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET/CT-Based Dosimetry in 90Y-Microsphere Selective Internal Radiation Therapy: Single Cohort Comparison With Pretreatment Planning on (99m)Tc-MAA Imaging and Correlation With Treatment Efficacy.
Song YS; Paeng JC; Kim HC; Chung JW; Cheon GJ; Chung JK; Lee DS; Kang KW
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jun; 94(23):e945. PubMed ID: 26061323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of perfused volume segmentation between cone-beam CT and
Martin M; Hocquelet A; Debordeaux F; Bordenave L; Blanc JF; Papadopoulos P; Lapuyade B; Trillaud H; Pinaquy JB
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2021 Jan; 102(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 33032960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High quality imaging and dosimetry for yttrium-90 (
Duan H; Khalaf MH; Ferri V; Baratto L; Srinivas SM; Sze DY; Iagaru A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2426-2436. PubMed ID: 33443618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planning dosimetry for
Thomas MA; Mahvash A; Abdelsalam M; Kaseb AO; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5333-5342. PubMed ID: 32790882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimisation of reconstruction, volumetry and dosimetry for
Bernardini M; Thevenet H; Berthold C; Desbrée A; Smadja C; Desiré C; Bianciardi M; Ghazzar N
Phys Med; 2017 Jul; 39():147-155. PubMed ID: 28687192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The superior predictive value of
Smits MLJ; Dassen MG; Prince JF; Braat AJAT; Beijst C; Bruijnen RCG; de Jong HWAM; Lam MGEH
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Apr; 47(4):798-806. PubMed ID: 31399801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple method for estimating dose delivered to hepatocellular carcinoma after yttrium-90 glass-based radioembolization therapy: preliminary results of a proof of concept study.
Kokabi N; Galt JR; Xing M; Camacho JC; Barron BJ; Schuster DM; Kim HS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 24461133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison and reproducibility of two segmentation methods for multicompartment dosimetry: round robin study on radioembolization treatment planning in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lam M; Garin E; Palard-Novello X; Mahvash A; Kappadath C; Haste P; Tann M; Herrmann K; Barbato F; Geller B; Schaefer N; Denys A; Dreher M; Fowers KD; Gates V; Salem R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Dec; 51(1):245-257. PubMed ID: 37698645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An In-House 3D Voxel Dosimetric Tool to Compare Predictive and Post- Treatment Dosimetry in
Ferrando O; Bampi R; Foppiano F; Ciarmiello A
Curr Radiopharm; 2023 Jun; 16(3):214-221. PubMed ID: 36790008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative dosimetry between
Jadoul A; Bernard C; Lovinfosse P; Gérard L; Lilet H; Cornet O; Hustinx R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Apr; 47(4):828-837. PubMed ID: 31388721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin poorly predicts the intrahepatic distribution of 90Y resin microspheres in hepatic radioembolization.
Wondergem M; Smits ML; Elschot M; de Jong HW; Verkooijen HM; van den Bosch MA; Nijsen JF; Lam MG
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1294-301. PubMed ID: 23749996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partition Model-Based 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Predictive Dosimetry Compared with 90Y TOF PET/CT Posttreatment Dosimetry in Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Quantitative Agreement Comparison.
Gnesin S; Canetti L; Adib S; Cherbuin N; Silva Monteiro M; Bize P; Denys A; Prior JO; Baechler S; Boubaker A
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1672-1678. PubMed ID: 27307346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radioembolization of hepatocarcinoma with (90)Y glass microspheres: development of an individualized treatment planning strategy based on dosimetry and radiobiology.
Chiesa C; Mira M; Maccauro M; Spreafico C; Romito R; Morosi C; Camerini T; Carrara M; Pellizzari S; Negri A; Aliberti G; Sposito C; Bhoori S; Facciorusso A; Civelli E; Lanocita R; Padovano B; Migliorisi M; De Nile MC; Seregni E; Marchianò A; Crippa F; Mazzaferro V
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1718-1738. PubMed ID: 26112387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Value of 99mTc-MAA SPECT for 90Y-Labeled Resin Microsphere Distribution in Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Hepatic Tumors.
Ilhan H; Goritschan A; Paprottka P; Jakobs TF; Fendler WP; Todica A; Bartenstein P; Hacker M; Haug AR
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26315830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel tool for motion-related dose inaccuracies reduction in
Santoro M; Della Gala G; Paolani G; Zagni F; Strolin S; Civollani S; Calderoni L; Cappelli A; Mosconi C; Lodi Rizzini E; Tabacchi E; Morganti AG; Fanti S; Golfieri R; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2022 Jun; 98():98-112. PubMed ID: 35526374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
