These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34340020)

  • 1. Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.
    Goldsworthy RL; Camarena A; Bissmeyer SRS
    Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108319. PubMed ID: 34340020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
    Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Goldsworthy RL; Bissmeyer SRS; Camarena A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 34981263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Bissmeyer SRS; Goldsworthy RL
    Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 424():108583. PubMed ID: 35930901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.
    Kovačić D; James CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):665-680. PubMed ID: 35918501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
    Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat.
    Richardson ML; Guérit F; Gransier R; Wouters J; Carlyon RP; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 35668206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO; Luo X
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people.
    Clark GM
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):766-76. PubMed ID: 8911712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch Perception With the Temporal Limits Encoder for Cochlear Implants.
    Zhou H; Kan A; Yu G; Guo Z; Zheng N; Meng Q
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():2528-2539. PubMed ID: 36044501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.