These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34340021)
1. Reverberation strength perceived by normal-hearing listeners predictable based on time-varying binaural loudness. Ellis GM; Zahorik P Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108316. PubMed ID: 34340021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation. Ellis GM; Zahorik P Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of reverberation-related binaural cues in the externalization of speech. Catic J; Santurette S; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1154-67. PubMed ID: 26328729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binaural Speech Understanding With Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Reverberation. Kokkinakis K Am J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 29279894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation. Reinhart PN; Souza PE J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of psychoacoustic-based reverberance parameters. Lee D; van Dorp Schuitman J; Cabrera D; Qiu X; Burnett I J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1832. PubMed ID: 29092554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of overlap-masking on binaural reverberant word intelligibility. Libbey B; Rogers PH J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3141-51. PubMed ID: 15603159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model. Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults. Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation. Gelfand SA; Hochberg I Audiology; 1976; 15(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 1252192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space. Traer J; McDermott JH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):E7856-E7865. PubMed ID: 27834730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Varying Reverberation on Music Perception for Young Normal-Hearing and Old Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Reinhart PN; Souza PE Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517750706. PubMed ID: 29320944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. Nábĕlek AK; Robinson PK J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1242-8. PubMed ID: 7085996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss. Shi LF; Doherty KA J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]