These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34340583)

  • 1. The Impact of Transparency and Decision Risk on Human-Automation Teaming Outcomes.
    Loft S; Bhaskara A; Lock BA; Skinner M; Brooks J; Li R; Bell J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):846-861. PubMed ID: 34340583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of automation transparency in the management of multiple unmanned vehicles.
    Bhaskara A; Duong L; Brooks J; Li R; McInerney R; Skinner M; Pongracic H; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103243. PubMed ID: 32919121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do concurrent task demands impact the benefit of automation transparency?
    Tatasciore M; Bowden V; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jul; 110():104022. PubMed ID: 37019048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transparent Automated Advice to Mitigate the Impact of Variation in Automation Reliability.
    Gegoff I; Tatasciore M; Bowden V; McCarley J; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2008-2024. PubMed ID: 37635389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transparency improves the accuracy of automation use, but automation confidence information does not.
    Tatasciore M; Strickland L; Loft S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Oct; 9(1):67. PubMed ID: 39379606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can increased automation transparency mitigate the effects of time pressure on automation use?
    Tatasciore M; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jan; 114():104142. PubMed ID: 37757606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management.
    Mercado JE; Rupp MA; Chen JY; Barnes MJ; Barber D; Procci K
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 26867556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Benefits and Costs of Low and High Degree of Automation.
    Tatasciore M; Bowden VK; Visser TAW; Michailovs SIC; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):874-896. PubMed ID: 31424968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Workload Capacity: A Response Time-Based Measure of Automation Dependence.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):462-71. PubMed ID: 26811351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should We Just Let the Machines Do It? The Benefit and Cost of Action Recommendation and Action Implementation Automation.
    Tatasciore M; Bowden VK; Visser TAW; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1121-1136. PubMed ID: 33555966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agent Transparency, Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Operator Performance: A Systematic Literature Review.
    van de Merwe K; Mallam S; Nazir S
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jan; 66(1):180-208. PubMed ID: 35274577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Perception of Automation Reliability and Acceptance of Automated Advice.
    Hutchinson J; Strickland L; Farrell S; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1596-1612. PubMed ID: 34979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: Forefront of Human-Automation Teaming.
    Calhoun G
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 34435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibitory Cognitive Control Allows Automated Advice to Improve Accuracy While Minimizing Misuse.
    Strickland L; Heathcote A; Bowden VK; Boag RJ; Wilson MK; Khan S; Loft S
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Nov; 32(11):1768-1781. PubMed ID: 34570615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Task Difficulty and Display Format on Automation Usage Strategy: A Workload Capacity Analysis.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):527-537. PubMed ID: 29470135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation.
    Wickens CD; Clegg BA; Vieane AZ; Sebok AL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):728-39. PubMed ID: 25886768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting a Single Automation Failure: The Impact of Expected (But Not Experienced) Automation Reliability.
    Bowden VK; Griffiths N; Strickland L; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 34375538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.