These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34341320)

  • 1. No Difference in Reoperation Rates for Adjacent Segment Disease (Operative Adjacent Segment Disease) in Posterior Cervical Fusions Stopping at C7 Versus T1/T2: A Cohort of 875 Patients-Part 1.
    Guppy KH; Royse KE; Fennessy J; Norheim EP; Harris JE; Brara HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Feb; 47(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34341320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No difference in reoperation rates for nonunions (operative nonunions) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1/2: a cohort of 875 patients.
    Guppy KH; Royse KE; Fennessy JH; Norheim EP; Harris JE; Brara HS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Jun; 36(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 34952515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral Mass Screws Versus Pedicle Screws at C7: Reoperation Rates for Operative Adjacent Segment Disease and Nonunion in Posterior Cervical Fusion.
    Brara HS; Royse KE; Fennessy J; Harris JE; Guppy KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jul; 48(13):920-929. PubMed ID: 36763836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction in Cervical Arthrodesis Results in Lower Rates of Adjacent Segment Disease Without Affecting Operative Risks or Patient-Reported Outcomes.
    Ibaseta A; Rahman R; Andrade NS; Uzosike AC; Byrapogu VK; Ramji AF; Skolasky RL; Reidler JS; Kebaish KM; Riley LH; Sciubba DM; Cohen DB; Neuman BJ
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):377-381. PubMed ID: 31609799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There is no increased risk of adjacent segment disease at the cervicothoracic junction following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to C7.
    Louie PK; Presciutti SM; Iantorno SE; Bohl DD; Shah K; Shifflett GD; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Sep; 17(9):1264-1271. PubMed ID: 28456670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is it safe to stop at C7 during multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion? - multicenter analysis.
    Truumees E; Singh D; Lavelle W; Riesenburger R; Geck M; Kurra S; Yu A; Grits D; Dowd R; Winkelman R; Mroz T; Stokes J
    Spine J; 2021 Jan; 21(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 32890781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Selection in Posterior Cervical Fusion: Does Cervicothoracic Junction Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Predict Mechanical Failure?
    Labrum JT; Khan I; Archer KR; Abtahi AM; Stephens BF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Apr; 46(8):E482-E490. PubMed ID: 33186274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior Multilevel Instrumentation of the Lower Cervical Spine: Is Bridging the Cervicothoracic Junction Necessary?
    Osterhoff G; Ryang YM; von Oelhafen J; Meyer B; Ringel F
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():419-423. PubMed ID: 28427976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusions Involving C7 Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Goyal A; Akhras A; Wahood W; Alvi MA; Nassr A; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():588-595.e5. PubMed ID: 30954754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging screening for a surgical decision regarding the approach for anterior spine fusion at the cervicothoracic junction.
    Fraser JF; Diwan AD; Peterson M; O'Brien MF; Mintz DN; Khan SN; Sandhu HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):675-81. PubMed ID: 11923658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should long-segment cervical fusions be routinely carried into the thoracic spine? A multicenter analysis.
    Truumees E; Singh D; Geck MJ; Stokes JK
    Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28962908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction During Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Is It Necessary?
    Fayed I; Toscano DT; Triano MJ; Makariou E; Lee C; Spitz SM; Anaizi AN; Nair MN; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jun; 86(6):E544-E550. PubMed ID: 32315427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is It Necessary to Extend a Multilevel Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion to the Upper Thoracic Spine?
    Schroeder GD; Kepler CK; Kurd MF; Mead L; Millhouse PW; Kumar P; Nicholson K; Stawicki C; Helber A; Fasciano D; Patel AA; Woods BI; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Anderson DG; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(23):1845-1849. PubMed ID: 27898600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-Term Results after Multilevel Fusion of the Cervical Spine and the Cervicothoracic Junction: To Bridge or Not To Bridge?
    Scholz C; Klingler JH; Masalha W; Hohenhaus M; Volz F; Vasilikos I; Roelz R; Scheiwe C; Hubbe U
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e556-e564. PubMed ID: 33476777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative Risks and Benefits of Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction During Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Multicenter Cohort.
    Okamoto N; Kato S; Doi T; Matsubayashi Y; Taniguchi Y; Yoshida Y; Kawamura N; Nakarai H; Higashikawa A; Tozawa K; Takeshita Y; Yu J; Hara N; Sasaki K; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():e265-e274. PubMed ID: 34175484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervicothoracic fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 450 patients.
    Guppy KH; Harris J; Chen J; Paxton EW; Bernbeck JA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 27104284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervical (subaxial) fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 1158 patients.
    Guppy KH; Harris J; Chen J; Paxton EW; Alvarez J; Bernbeck J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 26722955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What does degeneration at the cervicothoracic junction tell us? A kinematic MRI study of 93 individuals.
    Kim MS; Gilbert ZD; Bajouri Z; Telang S; Fresquez Z; Pickering TA; Son SM; Alluri RK; Wang JC; Buser Z
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jul; 32(7):2425-2430. PubMed ID: 37148392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Constructs.
    Murphy TP; Colantonio DF; Le AH; Fredericks DR; Schlaff CD; Holm EB; Sebastian AS; Pisano AJ; Helgeson MD; Wagner SC
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Jun; 36(5):E212-E217. PubMed ID: 36823698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.