These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3434265)

  • 1. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise.
    Dowell RC; Seligman PM; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 104(5-6):439-46. PubMed ID: 3434265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise.
    Franz BK; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    Am J Otol; 1987 Nov; 8(6):516-8. PubMed ID: 3434615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the F0F2 and F0F1F2 processing strategies for the Cochlear Corporation cochlear implant.
    Tye-Murray N; Lowder M; Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 2358129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception with multi-channel cochlear implant of short duration pulse strategy.
    Funasaka S; Takahashi O; Yukawa K; Hatsushika S; Hayashibara S
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1987; 14(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 3451734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2 and F0F1F2B3B4B5 speech processing strategies.
    Parkinson AJ; Tyler RS; Woodworth GG; Lowder MW; Gantz BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8729916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Tong YC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 6547734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-Based Inclusion Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Postlingual Deafness.
    Snel-Bongers J; Netten AP; Boermans PBM; Rotteveel LJC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 29642089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of adult Ineraid and Nucleus cochlear implant patients after 3.5 years of use.
    Tyler RS; Lowder MW; Parkinson AJ; Woodworth GG; Gantz BJ
    Audiology; 1995; 34(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 8561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis.
    Tong YC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1897-8. PubMed ID: 6893993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Dowell RC; Seligman PM; Brimacombe JA; Beiter AL
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 2026285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Metselaar RM; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e232-e240. PubMed ID: 28125445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
    Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.