275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34342691)
1. Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography-a prospective study.
Gweon HM; Eun NL; Youk JH; Jeong J; Bae SJ; Ahn SG; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):815-821. PubMed ID: 34342691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
Taskin F; Kalayci CB; Tuncbilek N; Soydemir E; Kurt N; Kaya H; Aribal E
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fueger BJ; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Pötsch N; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Breast; 2021 Apr; 56():53-60. PubMed ID: 33618160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Residual Malignancy After Excisional Biopsy for Breast Cancer With Suspicious Microcalcifications: Comparison of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Park G; Bae K; Hwang IY; Kim JS; Kwon WJ; Bang M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):e753-e758. PubMed ID: 31182403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic development of an abbreviated protocol for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Strahle DA; Pathak DR; Sierra A; Saha S; Strahle C; Devisetty K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(2):283-295. PubMed ID: 28138893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast and Noninvasive Characterization of Suspicious Lesions Detected at Breast Cancer X-Ray Screening: Capability of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with MIPs.
Bickelhaupt S; Laun FB; Tesdorff J; Lederer W; Daniel H; Stieber A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):689-97. PubMed ID: 26418516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unveiling the potential of breast MRI: a game changer for BI-RADS 4A microcalcifications.
Li S; Lin Y; Liu G; Shao Z; Yang Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jul; 206(2):425-435. PubMed ID: 38664289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI as a complementary tool for the assessment of suspicious mammographic calcifications: Does it have a role?
Di Ninno AAM; Mello GGN; Torres US; Shimizu C; Tucunduva TCM; Reis FRS; Ananias MPF; Lederman HM
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jun; 74():76-83. PubMed ID: 33454580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
Brnic D; Brnic D; Simundic I; Vanjaka Rogosic L; Tadic T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of DCE- MRI of the breast as a diagnostic tool in assessing amorphous calcifications in screening mammography.
Wang S; Wang H; Li Y; Lou J; Zou Q; Jiang Y; Wu F; Tang Y; Wang S
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1151500. PubMed ID: 37182168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
