These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34344389)

  • 1. Cannons and sparrows II: the enhanced Bernoulli exact method for determining statistical significance and effect size in the meta-analysis of k 2 × 2 tables.
    Paul LM
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 34344389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cannons and sparrows: an exact maximum likelihood non-parametric test for meta-analysis of k 2 × 2 tables.
    Paul LM
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2018; 15():9. PubMed ID: 29983722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of simple and accessible methods for meta-analysis involving rare events: A simulation study.
    Hodkinson A; Kontopantelis E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1589-1608. PubMed ID: 34139915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method.
    IntHout J; Ioannidis JP; Borm GF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24548571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Reis IM; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):893-906. PubMed ID: 10363329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-world Performance of Meta-analysis Methods for Double-Zero-Event Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes Using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Ren Y; Lin L; Lian Q; Zou H; Chu H
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 34(6):960-968. PubMed ID: 30887438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.
    Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Awad T; Thabane L; Gluud C
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):238-53. PubMed ID: 26061888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
    Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misunderstandings about Q and 'Cochran's Q test' in meta-analysis.
    Hoaglin DC
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 26303773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of old and new tests of heterogeneity in epidemiologic meta-analysis.
    Takkouche B; Cadarso-Suárez C; Spiegelman D
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 150(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 10412966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computing Critical Values of Exact Tests by Incorporating Monte Carlo Simulations Combined with Statistical Tables.
    Vexler A; Kim YM; Yu J; Lazar NA; Hutson A
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2014 Dec; 41(4):1013-1030. PubMed ID: 27030787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved inference for fixed-effects meta-analysis of 2 × 2 tables.
    Qijun Li K; Rice K
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 32092228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact meta-analysis approach for discrete data and its application to 2 × 2 tables with rare events.
    Liu D; Liu RY; Xie M
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2014 Oct; 109(508):1450-1465. PubMed ID: 25620825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.