These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34344389)

  • 21. Correction for bias in meta-analysis of little-replicated studies.
    Doncaster CP; Spake R
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 9(3):634-644. PubMed ID: 29938012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Holling H; Jansen K
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):706-730. PubMed ID: 38111986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Different meta-analysis methods can change judgements about imprecision of effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Wang Z; Alzuabi MA; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Falck-Ytter Y; Dahm P; Sultan S; Murad MH
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Apr; 28(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 36732029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Asymptotic versus exact methods in the analysis of contingency tables: Evidence-based practical recommendations.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2569-2582. PubMed ID: 32020833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
    Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC; Bakbergenuly I; Newman J
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):711-730. PubMed ID: 33969638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis of rare events under the assumption of a homogeneous treatment effect.
    Piaget-Rossel R; Taffé P
    Biom J; 2019 Nov; 61(6):1557-1574. PubMed ID: 31172565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; White IR; Jackson D; Spiegelhalter DJ; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5495-5511. PubMed ID: 27577523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exact inference for fixed effects meta-analysis of
    Hansen S; Rice K
    Stat Med; 2023 Aug; 42(19):3333-3352. PubMed ID: 37278134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation.
    Jung SH
    Biom J; 2014 Jan; 56(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 24395208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response.
    Liu IM; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 8962452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Zintzaras E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1023-32. PubMed ID: 16980141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.