These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34344515)

  • 1. Trends in the Outcomes of High-risk Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2018.
    Lemor A; Basir MB; Truesdell AG; Tamis-Holland JE; Alqarqaz M; Grines CL; Villablanca PA; Alaswad K; Pinto DS; O'Neill W
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 156():65-71. PubMed ID: 34344515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention requiring mechanical circulatory support in patients without cardiogenic shock.
    Al-Khadra Y; Alraies MC; Darmoch F; Pacha HM; Soud M; Kaki A; Rab T; Grines CL; Meraj P; Alaswad K; Kwok CS; Mamas M; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 31254325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Singh A; Jauhar R; Meraj PM
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):369-378. PubMed ID: 29308660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Hemodynamic Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock and Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis'.
    Desai R; Hanna B; Singh S; Gupta S; Deshmukh A; Kumar G; Sachdeva R; Berman AE
    Am J Med Sci; 2021 Jan; 361(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 33008567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.
    Khera R; Cram P; Vaughan-Sarrazin M; Horwitz PA; Girotra S
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 117(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 26547292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diffusion of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in US Markets.
    Bjarnason TA; Mentias A; Panaich S; Vaughan Sarrazin M; Gao Y; Desai M; Pandey A; Dhruva SS; Desai NR; Girotra S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Aug; 15(8):e011778. PubMed ID: 35904015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart™ percutaneous left ventricular assist device support: Six years of experience and outcomes.
    Nascimbene A; Loyalka P; Gregoric ID; Kar B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 87(6):1101-10. PubMed ID: 26589637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editor's Choice- Impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial.
    Zeymer U; Werdan K; Schuler G; Zahn R; Neumann FJ; Fürnau G; de Waha S; Schneider S; Thiele H
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Oct; 6(7):601-609. PubMed ID: 27655918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy and safety of mechanical hemodynamic support in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with or without cardiogenic shock: Bayesian approach network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.
    Lee JM; Park J; Kang J; Jeon KH; Jung JH; Lee SE; Han JK; Kim HL; Yang HM; Park KW; Kang HJ; Koo BK; Kim SH; Kim HS
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 184():36-46. PubMed ID: 25697869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Hemodynamic Support in the USA: A 5 Year Experience.
    Patel NJ; Singh V; Patel SV; Savani C; Patel N; Panaich S; Arora S; Cohen MG; Grines C; Badheka AO
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 28(6):563-73. PubMed ID: 26643003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-center experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Al-Husami W; Yturralde F; Mohanty G; Pastore C; Lotun K; Venesy D; Waxman S; Pyne C; Gossman D; Nesto R; Piemonte T
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):319-22. PubMed ID: 18523330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Cardiogenic Shock.
    Rios SA; Bravo CA; Weinreich M; Olmedo W; Villablanca P; Villela MA; Ramakrishna H; Hirji S; Robles OA; Mahato P; Gluud C; Bhatt DL; Jorde UP
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 122(8):1330-1338. PubMed ID: 30146099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prophylactic Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Zeitouni M; Marquis-Gravel G; Smilowitz NR; Zakroysky P; Wojdyla DM; Amit AP; Rao SV; Wang TY
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 May; 15(5):e011534. PubMed ID: 35580202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous ventricular assist device for higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in surgically ineligible patients: Indications and outcomes from the OPTIMUM study.
    Hirai T; Grantham JA; Kandzari DE; Ballard W; Brown WM; Allen KB; Kirtane AJ; Argenziano M; Yeh RW; Khabbaz K; Lombardi W; Lasala J; Kachroo P; Karmpaliotis D; Gosch KL; Salisbury AC;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(5):814-822. PubMed ID: 37676058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kar B; Forrester M; Gemmato C; Civitello A; Loyalka P; Myers T; Reynolds D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Mar; 18(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16598104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk cardiac interventions and cardiogenic shock.
    Thomas JL; Al-Ameri H; Economides C; Shareghi S; Abad DG; Mayeda G; Burstein S; Shavelle DM
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 22(8):360-4. PubMed ID: 20679671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.
    Lemor A; Patel N; Jain T; Baber U; Hernandez G; Villablanca P; Basir MB; Alaswad K; Mehran R; Dangas G; Sharma SK; Kini A
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 19(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 31895248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.