269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34344628)
1. Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting.
Huang MM; Alam R; Gabrielson AT; Su ZT; Kassiri B; Fletcher SA; Biles MJ; Patel HD; Pavlovich CP; Schwen ZR
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 34344628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the Transition from Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting Among Men with Very Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
Van Hemelrijck M; Garmo H; Lindhagen L; Bratt O; Stattin P; Adolfsson J
Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 27816297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Epstein JI; Landis P; Macura KJ; Simopoulos DN; Carter HB; Gorin MA
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):675-682. PubMed ID: 31918957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
Druskin SC; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Carter HB; Trock BJ
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30114397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Kearns JT; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y; Lin DW
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):706-712. PubMed ID: 29433973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active Surveillance Versus Watchful Waiting for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Model to Inform Decisions.
Loeb S; Zhou Q; Siebert U; Rochau U; Jahn B; Mühlberger N; Carter HB; Lepor H; Braithwaite RS
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 28844371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Baraban E; Erak E; Fatima A; Akbari A; Zhao J; Fletcher SA; Bhanji Y; de la Calle CM; Mamawala M; Landis P; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 37042826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes.
Cooperberg MR; Brooks JD; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Kearns JT; Carroll PR; Dash A; Etzioni R; Fabrizio MD; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW; Zheng Y
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 29433975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Four Kallikrein Panel of the 4Kscore for Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer in Men in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Brown MD; Sjoberg DD; Dong Y; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg M; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y;
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 27889277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.
Vernooij RW; Lancee M; Cleves A; Dahm P; Bangma CH; Aben KK
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD006590. PubMed ID: 32495338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active surveillance should be considered for select men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer.
Pekala KR; Bergengren O; Eastham JA; Carlsson SV
BMC Urol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):152. PubMed ID: 37777716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer.
Thomsen FB; Røder MA; Jakobsen H; Langkilde NC; Borre M; Jakobsen EB; Frey A; Lund L; Lunden D; Dahl C; Brasso K
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Aug; 17(4):e814-e821. PubMed ID: 31196798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men Aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer.
Lu-Yao GL; Albertsen PC; Moore DF; Lin Y; DiPaola RS; Yao SL
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 25800944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
