These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3434537)

  • 1. Determination of lifting abilities: a comparative study of four techniques.
    Khalil TM; Waly SM; Genaidy AM; Asfour SS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Dec; 48(12):951-6. PubMed ID: 3434537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptable maximum effort (AME). A psychophysical measure of strength in back pain patients.
    Khalil TM; Goldberg ML; Asfour SS; Moty EA; Rosomoff RS; Rosomoff HL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1987 May; 12(4):372-6. PubMed ID: 2956699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle. Strength and dynamic capacity.
    Reyna JR; Leggett SH; Kenney K; Holmes B; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S; Garand D
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography: a comparative clinical trial.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000; 23(9):585-95. PubMed ID: 11145798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relation between isometric lifting strength and muscular fitness measures.
    Birch K; Sinnerton S; Reilly T; Lees A
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 8112286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength.
    Shechtman O; Hope LM; Sindhu BS
    J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(4):326-34; quiz 335. PubMed ID: 17954353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An electromyographic analysis of seated and standing lifting tasks.
    Yates JW; Karwowski W
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):889-98. PubMed ID: 1633795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation.
    Oesch P; Meyer K; Bachmann S; Hagen KB; Vøllestad NK
    Phys Ther; 2012 Sep; 92(9):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22652986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.
    Leskinen TP; Stålhammar HR; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):881-8. PubMed ID: 1633794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of differences between the maximum weights of lift acceptable to experienced and inexperienced materials handlers.
    Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1987 Aug; 30(8):1137-47. PubMed ID: 3691468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of posture and training on the endurance time of a low-level isometric contraction.
    Kahn JF; Favriou F; Jouanin JC; Monod H
    Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1231-9. PubMed ID: 9375537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perceived exertion during simulated static work].
    Schultz K
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1991 Jan; 37(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 2028676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trunk muscle endurance measurement. Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects.
    Mayer T; Gatchel R; Betancur J; Bovasso E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):920-6; discussion 926-7. PubMed ID: 7644957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human strength: measurements of maximum isometric forces in industry.
    Rühmann H; Schmidtke H
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jul; 32(7):865-79. PubMed ID: 2806222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.