319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34347225)
1. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of C-MAC
Gupta A; Singh P; Gupta N; Kumar Malhotra R; Girdhar KK
Paediatr Anaesth; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 34153141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy.
Yao WL; Wan L; Xu H; Qian W; Wang XR; Tian YK; Zhang CH
Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):810-7. PubMed ID: 25721326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope for Intubation in the Operating Room: A Comparative Quality Improvement Project.
De Jong A; Pouzeratte Y; Laplace A; Normanno M; Rollé A; Verzilli D; Perrigault PF; Colson P; Capdevila X; Molinari N; Jaber S
Anesth Analg; 2021 Feb; 132(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32739955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomised controlled trial.
Köhl V; Wünsch VA; Müller MC; Sasu PB; Dohrmann T; Peters T; Tolkmitt J; Dankert A; Krause L; Zöllner C; Petzoldt M
Anaesthesia; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38789407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study.
Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
Hansel J; Rogers AM; Lewis SR; Cook TM; Smith AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Apr; 4(4):CD011136. PubMed ID: 35373840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.
Kriege M; Alflen C; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I; Piepho T; Noppens RR
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016907. PubMed ID: 28827261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
Taylor AM; Peck M; Launcelott S; Hung OR; Law JA; MacQuarrie K; McKeen D; George RB; Ngan J
Anaesthesia; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 23121470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial.
Yi IK; Kwak HJ; Lee KC; Lee JH; Min SK; Kim JY
Eur J Med Res; 2020 Aug; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 32819444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of McGRATH®MAC videolaryngoscope blade 1 for tracheal intubation in small children: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Masui K; Asai T; Saito T; Okuda Y
J Anesth; 2023 Aug; 37(4):582-588. PubMed ID: 37311898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of CMAC and Truview picture capture device for endotracheal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing elective surgeries: A prospective randomized control trial.
Gupta A; Kamal G; Gupta A; Sehgal N; Bhatla S; Kumar R
Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1148-1153. PubMed ID: 30511796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the McGRATH
Kim JY; Park S; Oh M; Choi JB; John HJ; Lee SK; Choi YH
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
Paik H; Park HP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of McGrath Series 3 and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Normal Airway by Inexperienced Anesthetists: A Randomized Study.
Liu ZJ; Yi J; Guo WJ; Ma C; Huang YG
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(2):e2514. PubMed ID: 26765472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endobronchial tube intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization: A randomized controlled trial.
Yoo JY; Park SY; Kim JY; Kim M; Haam SJ; Kim DH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(10):e0081. PubMed ID: 29517671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
