201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34347935)
1. Evaluation of a suspended radiation protection system to reduce operator exposure in cardiology interventional procedures.
Zanca F; Dabin J; Collard C; Alexandre N; De Groote A; Salembier JP; Henry M; Rombaut E; Sghaier S; Massart PE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):E687-E694. PubMed ID: 34347935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Campbell J; Borgman A; Parker J; Wohns D
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 28041859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occupational exposure to physicians working with a Zero-Gravity™ protection system in haemodynamic and electrophysiology labs and the assessment of its performance against a standard ceiling suspended shield.
Domienik-Andrzejewska J; Mirowski M; Jastrzębski M; Górnik T; Masiarek K; Warchoł I; Grabowicz W
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2022 May; 61(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35218403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
McCutcheon K; Vanhaverbeke M; Pauwels R; Dabin J; Schoonjans W; Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Desmet W
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009627. PubMed ID: 33092401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended Protective Shield Under Table to Reduce Operator Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.
Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Zezza L; Fedele S; Ferraiuolo G
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007586. PubMed ID: 30732471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield.
Panetta CJ; Galbraith EM; Yanavitski M; Koller PK; Shah B; Iqbal S; Cigarroa JE; Gordon G; Rao SV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 31793752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures.
Haussen DC; Van Der Bom IM; Nogueira RG
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Oct; 8(10):1052-5. PubMed ID: 26491039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of the RADPAD Protection Drape in Reducing Operators' Radiation Exposure in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.
Vlastra W; Delewi R; Sjauw KD; Beijk MA; Claessen BE; Streekstra GJ; Bekker RJ; van Hattum JC; Wykrzykowska JJ; Vis MM; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Henriques JPS
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 29089313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?
Ingwersen M; Drabik A; Kulka U; Oestreicher U; Fricke S; Krankenberg H; Schwencke C; Mathey D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-102. PubMed ID: 24156970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.
Gilligan P; Lynch J; Eder H; Maguire S; Fox E; Doyle B; Casserly I; McCann H; Foley D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 26154301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of radiation exposure during complex interventions for chronic total coronary occlusions: Implementing low dose radiation protocols without affecting procedural success rates.
Werner GS; Glaser P; Coenen A; Moehlis H; Tischer KH; Koch M; Klingenbeck R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28112448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimizing exposure to radiation in invasive cardiology using modern dose-reduction technology: Evaluation of the real-life effects.
Faroux L; Blanpain T; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Herce B; Tourneux C; Metz D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 28862392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staff radiation dose during percutaneous coronary procedures: Role of adjunctive protective drapes.
Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Perone F; Porretta V; Fedele S; Romano S; Penco M; Ferraiuolo G
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):755-758. PubMed ID: 29691182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of various protective tools on the dose reduction in the eye lens in an interventional cardiology-clinical study.
Domienik J; Bissinger A; Grabowicz W; Jankowski Ł; Kręcki R; Makowski M; Masiarek K; Plewka M; Lubiński A; Peruga JZ
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):309-18. PubMed ID: 27183002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing Staff Dose in Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions by Comparing Clinical Data with Phantom Experiments.
Sailer AM; Paulis L; Vergoossen L; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):701-708.e1. PubMed ID: 30952523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive radiation shield minimizes operator radiation exposure in coronary and structural heart procedures.
Rizik DG; Gosselin KP; Burke RF; Goldstein JA
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():70-75. PubMed ID: 38538447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspended lead suit and physician radiation doses during coronary angiography.
Salcido-Rios J; McNamara DA; VanOosterhout S; VanLoo L; Redmond M; Parker JL; Madder RD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):981-988. PubMed ID: 34967086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
