These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34349370)
1. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit. Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients. Chan WK; Liu CY Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of incidence of sore throat with laryngeal mask airway Protector and laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: A randomised clinical trial. Mohan V; Rudingwa P; Panneerselvam S; Kuberan A; Srinivasan G; Arulprakasam S Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 68(7):637-643. PubMed ID: 39081918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®. van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of the LMA Protector™ airway in moderately obese patients. Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Ng LW; Lim CH; Zainal Abidin MF; Wan Zakaria WA; Teoh WH BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):184. PubMed ID: 32736516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients. Sng BL; Ithnin FB; Mathur D; Lew E; Han NR; Sia AT BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):26. PubMed ID: 28219323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study. Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial. Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study. Liu Y; Song Y; Wang M; Yang M; Shen H; Wang Z; Chen L; Yang J; Gong S; Yu Y; Shi Z; Zhang W; Zou X; Sun X; Wang Y; Fu Q; Cao J; Mi W BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):318. PubMed ID: 34930137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients. Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients. Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial. Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia-A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study. Bhushan D; Nandkumar S; Butani M Asian J Anesthesiol; 2022 Mar; 60():. PubMed ID: 35279972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]