408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34350500)
1. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.
Gao P; Wang Z; Kong X; Wang X; Fang Y; Wang J
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():13381-13392. PubMed ID: 33402848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT.
Ren Y; Yu Y; Xu K; Li Z; Wang X
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(10):1940-1948. PubMed ID: 37380747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transaxillary Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Not: A Comparative Study with Analysis of Surgical Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Wang M; Hai L; Xiao C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2304-2321. PubMed ID: 37700196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhang T; Ye J; Tian T
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Mar; 48(5):925-935. PubMed ID: 37464216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of breast implant removal after one- versus two-stage breast reconstructive surgery.
Theunissen CIJM; Brohet RM; Hu Y; van Uchelen JH; Mensen JHC; van Rijssen AL
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 May; 75(5):1610-1616. PubMed ID: 34975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Awadeen A; Fareed M; Elameen AM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 35879475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous Fat Grafting During Tissue Expander-to-Implant Exchange: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Escandón JM; Ali-Khan S; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1695-1706. PubMed ID: 36271157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Radiotherapy on Patient-reported Outcomes of Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):992-1001. PubMed ID: 32657919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; De Bernardis R; Loria FS; Petrucci V; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1291-1299. PubMed ID: 36944866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35927501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Biological Scaffold (Biodesign) in Postmastectomy Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A 5-Year Single-Institution Experience.
Sou WK; Perng CK; Ma H; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Lien PJ; Hsiao FY; Feng CJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(1s Suppl 1):S92-S98. PubMed ID: 35225854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
