These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34350705)

  • 1. The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.
    Hoeijmakers MJMM; Huberts W; Rutten MCM; van de Vosse FN
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Oct; 37(10):e3518. PubMed ID: 34350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.
    Hoeijmakers MJMM; Waechter-Stehle I; Weese J; Van de Vosse FN
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Oct; 36(10):e3387. PubMed ID: 32686898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of valvular resistance of segmented aortic valves using computational fluid dynamics.
    Hoeijmakers MJMM; Silva Soto DA; Waechter-Stehle I; Kasztelnik M; Weese J; Hose DR; de Vosse FNV
    J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():49-58. PubMed ID: 31358285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.
    Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CFD- and Bernoulli-based pressure drop estimates: A comparison using patient anatomies from heart and aortic valve segmentation of CT images.
    Weese J; Lungu A; Peters J; Weber FM; Waechter-Stehle I; Hose DR
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2281-2292. PubMed ID: 28276071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies.
    Gilon D; Cape EG; Handschumacher MD; Song JK; Solheim J; VanAuker M; King ME; Levine RA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 40(8):1479-86. PubMed ID: 12392840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User-dependent variability in mitral valve segmentation and its impact on CFD-computed hemodynamic parameters.
    Vellguth K; Brüning J; Tautz L; Degener F; Wamala I; Sündermann S; Kertzscher U; Kuehne T; Hennemuth A; Falk V; Goubergrits L
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1687-1696. PubMed ID: 31218472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific assessment of hemodynamics by computational fluid dynamics in patients with bicuspid aortopathy.
    Kimura N; Nakamura M; Komiya K; Nishi S; Yamaguchi A; Tanaka O; Misawa Y; Adachi H; Kawahito K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 153(4):S52-S62.e3. PubMed ID: 28190607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Thomas DD; Sadahiro M; Pearlman AS; Verrier ED; Thomas R; Kraft CD; Otto CM
    Circulation; 1994 Feb; 89(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 8313572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis.
    Ford LE; Feldman T; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
    Circ Res; 1990 Jan; 66(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2295132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond Bernoulli: Improving the Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Estimation of Peak Pressure Drops.
    Donati F; Myerson S; Bissell MM; Smith NP; Neubauer S; Monaghan MJ; Nordsletten DA; Lamata P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 10(1):e005207. PubMed ID: 28093412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis. A model-based approach.
    Laskey WK; Kussmaul WG; Noordergraaf A
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1473-8. PubMed ID: 7664429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic simulation of aortic valve stenosis using a lumped parameter cardiovascular system model with flow regime dependent valve pressure loss characteristics.
    Laubscher R; van der Merwe J; Liebenberg J; Herbst P
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Aug; 106():103838. PubMed ID: 35926953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fluid structure interaction modelling of aortic valve stenosis: Effects of valve calcification on coronary artery flow and aortic root hemodynamics.
    Kivi AR; Sedaghatizadeh N; Cazzolato BS; Zander AC; Roberts-Thomson R; Nelson AJ; Arjomandi M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105647. PubMed ID: 32688138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid Structure Interaction on Paravalvular Leakage of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Related to Aortic Stenosis: A Patient-Specific Case.
    Basri AA; Zuber M; Basri EI; Zakaria MS; Aziz AFA; Tamagawa M; Ahmad KA
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():9163085. PubMed ID: 32454886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of patient-specific morphologies on sinus flow stasis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An in vitro study.
    Hatoum H; Dollery J; Lilly SM; Crestanello J; Dasi LP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):540-549. PubMed ID: 29980299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study.
    Gill H; Fernandes JF; Nio A; Dockerill C; Shah N; Ahmed N; Raymond J; Wang S; Sotelo J; Urbina J; Uribe S; Rajani R; Rhode K; Lamata P
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2023 Aug; 16(4):862-873. PubMed ID: 36745287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute effects of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on the ventricular-aortic interaction.
    Pagoulatou S; Stergiopulos N; Bikia V; Rovas G; Licker MJ; Müller H; Noble S; Adamopoulos D
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2020 Dec; 319(6):H1451-H1458. PubMed ID: 33064556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.